Solar is coming to all new California homes. How many in Fresno already get power from sun?

By Tim Sheehan, The Fresno Bee

More than 1 million California homes are already soaking up sunshine with solar panels to generate electricity. Next year, that number will surge as new building standards take effect requiring all new homes permitted after Jan. 1 to have solar photovoltaic systems.

In Fresno, which already has the third-highest number of homes in California with rooftop solar panels, the number continues to grow even before the new California Energy Commission standards take full effect. Through the first six months of 2019, the city issued permits for more than 1,640 residential solar systems as additions or alterations to existing homes. That doesn’t count solar panels that home builders or developers are already offering as a feature on new homes.

As of June 30, more than 23,300 Fresno homes had solar systems in operation under the state’s Net Energy Metering (NEM) program. That’s third behind only San Diego and Bakersfield among California cities, according to data from Go Solar California. The total electrical output capacity of Fresno’s residential solar panel systems amounted to almost 148,700 kilowatts of direct current (DC) power. That’s about 144,000 kilowatts of alternating current or AC electricity after it’s converted from DC.

Fresno also has another 1,742 homes with solar installed from 2007 through 2017 under the older California Solar Initiative program.

“There are a few builders that offer solar as a standard feature, and others offer it as an option,” said Mike Prandini, president/CEO of the Building Industry Association of Fresno and Madera Counties. “Usually the solar that’s included is either included in the purchase price of the house, which makes the mortgage higher, or as a 15-year lease option.”

“It depends on which way it works out best in terms of cost for the mortgage or lease. But the big issue going forward is that they have to provide the solar,” Prandini added. “It becomes a cost item for the builders.” The result, he said, will likely be a greater impact on home buyers at lower- to middle-income levels as the added cost of solar potentially pinches their buying power. Some buyers, he said, may opt for cheaper options for such amenities as kitchen counter tops, cabinets, fixtures, appliances or others to offset the price of solar.

SWIMMING IN SUNSHINE

More than 868,000 California homes have solar panels that are interconnected to the state's power grid, with a total generating capacity of almost 4.8 million kilowatts (in AC electricity). Explore the map to see the number of residential solar projects and power production in individual counties.

Figures reflect all net energy metering (NEM) interconnected solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in the Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric service territories as of June 30, 2019. No interconnected systems were reported in Alpine, Del Norte, Siskiyou or Modoc counties.

Map: Tim Sheehan | The Fresno Bee Source: Go Solar California

SAVING $80 PER MONTH

The California Energy Commission estimates that the new-home requirements for solar and other energy features will add about $9,500 on average to the cost of building a new home – or about $40 per month over a 30-year mortgage. The commission also estimates, however, that home buyers will save about $19,000 in energy and maintenance costs during the life of the mortgage, or about $80 per month on heating, cooling and lighting bills.

In addition to requiring rooftop solar, the new standards encourage – but don’t require – including energy-related technology such as battery storage, heat-pump water heaters, and improved attic, wall and window insulation in new homes and other construction.

“Once rooftop solar electricity generation is factored in, homes built under the (new) standards will use about 53% less energy than those under the 2016 standards,” according to information published by the state commission.

Through the first six months of 2019, the city of Fresno issued almost 600 building permits for new single-family or duplex homes. The number of applications for new permits will grow – quickly – as builders work to delay the effect of the new building standards by securing building permits before Jan. 1.

For home builders who already offer solar as a standard feature, the new rules won’t really change anything.

“It actually won’t affect us at all,” said Brandon DeYoung, executive vice president of DeYoung Properties in Fresno. “For the last three years or more we’ve included solar in every one of our homes. … It is a solid value to our homes and homeowners.”

DeYoung said solar is a logical step after prior versions of the building code focused on energy efficiency features that have gone about as far as they can go.

“Now we’ve pretty much squeezed out all the energy we can through efficiency. At the end of the day, you have to use some electricity, no matter how efficient the home is,” he said. “So now we have to produce energy to offset what we use, and there’s a big nuclear reactor that comes up in the sky every day.”

TRYING TO BEAT THE CLOCK

“I can guarantee there will be a glut of permits being requested in November and December,” Prandini told The Bee. “Whenever there are major changes in codes, builders try to get three to five months worth of permits in December. That gives them time to figure things out under the current code before they actually have to comply with the new requirements.”

There’s another potential catch. Home builders don’t typically handle their own installation of rooftop solar on new homes. Instead, they rely on solar companies as subcontractors just as they do for drywall, carpentry, roofing and many other components of construction. There are worries among builders about the capacity of the solar industry to keep up with demand for new installations under the new code requirements.

“Nobody is really sure what’s going to happen when those first homes (permitted after Jan. 1) start under construction in mid-2020 and they need solar crews to put panels on the rooftops,” Prandini said.

“Solar contractors are loving it because they have a captive market, just like roofers and framers and plumbers. They’re ramping up, but it’s not just because of new construction,” he added. “What’s been driving solar in this area is the number of existing homes that are converting to solar.”

A trade association for the solar installing industry, however, said having sufficient labor to install solar should not be a problem for builders.

“There are about 77,000 people in the solar industry statewide, and it’s not unreasonable to think that companies won’t staff up more,” said Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar and Storage Association. “There are a lot of companies doing this work out there, mostly on existing homes, so this will just kind of shift the focus incrementally.”

Del Chiaro said she believes the 2020 standard “will mean about a 20% increase in the amount of solar installed if it is for all new homes.” She added that training for solar photovoltaic technicians, including a program at Fresno City College, is helping produce workers for the anticipated demand.

DeYoung said he’s not worried about a shortage of labor for solar subcontractors. “We’ve got seven or eight solar companies knocking on our doors wanting our business already,” he said. “There are plenty of solar companies in our area, and they see this as a huge business opportunity. They’re already starting to anticipate the need and gear up their hiring knowing that there’s going to be built-in customer demand.”

HOW MUCH POWER?

Rooftop solar panels absorb sunlight on photovoltaic cells to generate direct current electricity, which then gets converted into alternating current to flow to a home’s wiring through its electrical panel.

The amount of electricity that panels produce is measured in watts. A kilowatt (kW) is 1,000 watts; on a larger scale, a megawatt (mW) is 1 million watts.

Energy use is measured in kilowatt hours (kWh) – the number of kilowatts that are used over the course of an hour. A 100-watt light bulb burning continuously for 10 hours would use 1 kWh of electricity. The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that the average American home uses about 10,399 kWh over the course of a year, or or an average of about 867 kWh per month.

Between both Net Energy Metering and the older California Solar Initiative, the state has a total of 1,004,471 residential solar installations that collectively generate almost 5.5 million kW, or 5,486 mW, of electricity.

California has an abundant potential for rooftop solar, according to Google’s Project SunRoof, which uses satellite imagery of rooftops to estimate how much electricity could be generated by solar panels on all suitable buildings – residential, commercial, industrial or government.

Project SunRoof’s Data Explorer projects that in just the 43 California counties that it covers, rooftop solar panels could produce more than 243.3 billion kWh of electricity each year. Fresno County, with its wide swaths of forest and farmland where no rooftops exist, accounts for about 7.5 billion kWh of that potential. That doesn’t count a growing acreage of fallow or unproductive land where utility-scale solar “farms” are being developed to generate power.

More densely developed urban areas, by contrast, could generate much more juice – more than 48 billion kWh in Los Angeles County, or almost 23.7 billion kWh in Orange County.

Source: https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article234162737.html

California solar plus storage shows consistent installs, residential growth

By John Weaver, PV Magazine

CALSSA has obtained the interconnection data for California solar and solar plus storage for the first six months of 2019, showing significant volume of solar+storage in residential markets while commercial buyers are considering solar alone.

The California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) has collected and shared data on California’s behind the meter solar+storage activity in the first half of 2019, with data that goes back to the beginning of 2016.

The data suggests that within the three main investor owned utilities – San Diego Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric – commercial interconnections are running slightly behind the 2018 numbers (below image) in terms of projects interconnected. However, residential systems seem to be picking up a bit.

One chart that gives a bit of indigestion is the time for approval for stand alone and solar+storage installations – if only because of the high variance, but also because quite a few larger projects take more than a year to get approved. The projects are divided into residential, commercial, education and industrial with time frames ranging roughly from 30 to 60 days for residential, to two years for industrial systems.

Adding solar power to a storage installation seems to speed up the amount of time for a residential installation, however, it slows a commercial installation.

In Pacific Gas & Electric territory 20% of residential energy storage systems are stand alone, while in the other territories solar is coupled with storage 99-100% of time. Commercial installations had an inverse relationship though – with only 40% of storage projects coupled with solar power, suggesting the market is being driven by other factors like demand charges.

While not broken out on an annual basis, so tougher to see recent trends, we did get insight into the top manufacturers of modules and inverters. Hanwha really has a market hold on residential modules (below chart) at 23% of product deployed, with LG & Sunpower bringing the top three to 49% of market share. The report does note 107 unique solar module brand names since 2016.

Commercial modules have SunPower on top though at 14% of all systems, with LG and Canadian Solar at 10%.

Inverters are a much tighter marketplace – with 56% of residential being SolarEdge product, followed by 20% Enphase and 12% SunPower (some of which are Enphase). The commercial market is 13% SMA, 16% Yaskawa-Solectria and 14% SolarEdge.

Installation companies are to be found aplenty – with the long tail of residential installation companies at just shirt of 1,700, and over 450 commercial installation companies noted. In the residential space, Vivint has installed over 8,000 systems totalling 50 MW and 13% of total capacity. Quickly this falls off to Tesla (SunRun mostly) at 6% of systems, SunRun at 5%, and SunPower at 3% – then a massive number of companies at 2% and less showing that customers who own pick from a variety of sources.



California board votes to limit who can install energy storage

By Christian Roselund, PV Magazine

The vote by a committee of the Contractor State License Board was not the worst outcome, but it begins a process to limit the kind of energy storage systems that solar installers who do not have an electrician’s license can put online.

Last night the Legislative Committee of California’s Contractor State License Board (CSLB) voted to begin the process of limiting the installation of energy storage systems, including those that accompany rooftop solar, to licensed electricians.

In specific terms, this means those who hold a C-10 electrical license, and not solar installers who only hold C-46 licenses. While the committee did not go forward with an outright ban, the option that it chose would allow solar installers with C-46 licenses to install energy storage only under the following circumstances:

  • Limit to a PV system up to 10kW on a single-family dwelling or duplex with a battery system that must not exceed a 5kW backup/20kWh energy

  • The battery system is installed at same time as solar PV system

  • No upgrade or alteration is made to the existing electrical system

California Solar and Storage Association (CALSSA) blamed both the utilities and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which had pushed for the outright ban on installations by C-46 license holders. The organization had choice words for CSLB’s action:

It was a blatant, outright abuse of power threatening to lead to arbitrary and capricious restrictions on thousands of workers and their contractor employers with absolutely no empirical data in support: simply because the utilities and the IBEW say so.  

CALSSA and Vote Solar testified against the proposal during last night’s five-hour meeting, and CALSSA mobilized its members to testify as well. The organization says that concerns over safety are a “sham” and cites what it describes as the “impeccable” record of California’s solar installers, most of whom hold C-46 licenses.

“Watching the investor owned utilities and their henchmen bend a state agency to their will in broad daylight, attacking us in yet another forum at the expense of harming real businesses not to mention the state’s clean energy goals, was disturbing,” stated CALSSA.

But they were not alone; Sierra Club also testified in favor of the IBEW-backed proposal to entirely limit the installation of energy storage to C-10 license holders. In an email to pv magazine, Sierra Club described its position as merely wanting to “continue” the requirement that only C-10 licensed contractors can install energy storage, and “closing a loophole” that allowed non-electricians to install batteries. Sierra Club’s testimony provided further insight into its position:

We must have qualified people install and maintain battery storage systems in the safest and most effective manner whether they are stand alone or are paired with solar. For us, that means all battery storage systems – from residential to utility scale – should be installed only by licensed C-10 contractors with state certified electricians.

This is far from the end; CALSSA says that despite the desire of the IBEW and the utilities to put this matter to rest at the next meeting on September 24, that this is not going to happen. Instead, CALSSA says that it will “likely take months” for CSLB to develop the details of this restriction, which will be followed by another hearing and vote. “We are talking 2-3 years before any potential change hits the market,” stated CALSSA.

Source: https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2019/08/07/california-board-votes-to-limit-who-can-install-energy-storage/

California clears final hurdle for state's landmark solar panel mandate for new homes

By Jeff Daniels, CNBC

A requirement for new homes built in California starting in 2020 to include solar rooftop panels is now formally part of the state's building code. It follows approval Tuesday by the California Building Standards Commission of a plan endorsed in May by a state energy panel.

The action by the state building standards commission came in a unanimous 8-0 vote and makes California the first state in the nation to mandate solar-energy installations on most single-family homes as well as multi-family residential buildings up to three stories, including condos and apartment complexes. However, the solar rule has raised concerns the cost to build new homes will soar and further erode home affordability statewide.

The solar requirement is expected to add on average about $9,500 to the cost of new houses but is projected to be offset by about $19,000 in energy savings over a 30-year period, according to the California Energy Commission. Back in May, the energy policy and planning agency approved the requirement for solar panels for most new California homes built starting in 2020.

"Today's unanimous vote was the culmination of more than two years of work by SEIA, it's partner organizations and of course policy makers in the Golden State," said Sean Gallagher, vice president of state affairs for the Solar Energy Industries Association, a trade association of the solar energy industry. "We hope other states will look at what California has done and consider similar policies to encourage clean and low cost solar energy."

The state has estimated that solar standards applying to most homes and many commercial structures could save California residents and businesses millions in energy costs. The new standards require solar photovoltaics on new residential single-family buildings and multifamily buildings up to three stories high.

"While per capita electricity consumption in the U.S. has increased steadily over the last 40 years, California's per capita consumption has remained flat, due in large measure to building and appliance efficiency standards," California Energy Commission Executive Director Drew Bohan said in remarks Tuesday before the building standards panel in support of the new solar mandate. "The new standards presented today will guide the construction of buildings that will continue to keep costs down, better withstand the impacts of climate change, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions."

The approved standards still allow new home construction to continue with some natural gas but the state is pushing to reduce gas need over time and facilitate a shift to high-efficiency electric appliances, such as heat pump water heaters.

"These highly energy efficient and solar-powered homes will save families money on their energy bills from the moment they walk through their front door," said Kelly Knutsen, director of technology advancement for the California Solar and Storage Association, an industry trade group. "Homebuyers will also have a solar plus storage option, allowing their home-grown clean energy to work for them day and night."

The California Building Industry Association estimates that only 15 to 20 percent of the single-family homes built in California have solar panel installations. At least seven cities in the state, including San Francisco, already have solar mandates of one form or another on new buildings.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/06/california-clears-final-hurdle-for-state-solar-mandate-for-new-homes.html