Consumers, Climate Activists and Green Workers Rally Across California to Keep Rooftop Solar Growing and Affordable

Day of action across the State to save solar

California—Coalitions of energy consumers, climate activists and green workers held rallies across California today, calling on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and Governor Newsom to keep rooftop solar growing and affordable. 

The CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. A proposed decision released by the CPUC in November would immediately slash net energy metering credits by 75 percent, down to between $0.05 and $0.08 per kilowatt. 

The proposed changes would make solar unaffordable for most consumers, eliminate green jobs in the solar industry, and slow California’s progress towards 100 percent clean energy. A vote on the proposed decision by the CPUC is expected on December 15. 

At churches, restaurants, historic plazas, utility offices and the CPUC headquarters, solar advocates held ten simultaneous events in San Diego. Los Angeles, Palm Springs, Bakersfield, Fresno, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, San Francisco, Stockton, and Chico. 

Quotes:

“Sending rooftop solar off a cliff and making it too expensive for everyday people fulfills the utilities' dream," said Solar Rights Alliance director Dave Rosenfeld. “It will also harm everyday Californians looking for a break from ever rising energy bills, blackouts and air pollution. This is Governor Newsom's moment to show the public where he stands. Will he keep rooftop solar growing, or let it wither at the hands of the monopoly?” 

"Rooftop solar has seen its greatest growth in Latino communities. These immigrant communities struggle monthly to pay their energy bill, especially those in the Central Valley and desert communities where summer temperatures are often over 100 degrees. Rooftop solar is a liberating technology for those families. Now PUC bureaucrats want to roll back solar incentives for our families. That’s unjust,” said Francisco Moreno, Executive Director of The Council of Mexican Federations in North America (COFEM).

“The CPUC’s proposal throws a wrench into a successful incentive program that has helped California become number one in the nation for solar production,” said Steven King with Environment California. “By discouraging everyday Californians from going solar, we put our climate, public health and energy resilience at risk. To build a clean energy future, rooftop solar is an important tool we need to keep in our toolbox.” 

“Affordable energy is critical to local families. However, when we outreach into environmental justice communities, the first economic complaint of most families is the incredible portion of their income they spend on electricity and water,” said Esperanza Vielma of the Environmental Justice Coalition for Water.

“In our communities many families go without basic necessities in the hot summer months because they need to pay large electrical bills or the IOUs cut that power. Unfortunately, the CPUC's proposal will make access to cheaper rooftop solar for our communities more expensive and out of our reach. That's going backward,” said Destiny Rivas of the San Joaquin Urban Native Council. 

“Our business is in the process of adding solar panels and backup storage because it makes economic sense. With lower monthly electric bills, we can keep our restaurant prices affordable and serve our community,” said Alicia Cardenas, the owner of Nena's on B Street, a popular Mexican restaurant in Stockton. 

Background:

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches, farms, and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during recent heat waves. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

A proposed decision released in December 2022, that would have implemented an unprecedented solar tax and drastic net metering credit reductions, was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. Despite that backlash and the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar in California, the CPUC’s current proposed decision still includes an immediate and drastic slash to the value of net metering.   

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the California leaders to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers. More than 160,000 people submitted comments to the CPUC and Governor Newsom calling for a strong NEM-3 decision, the highest count in CPUC history.

CALSSA Statement on CPUC’s Revised Proposed Decision on Solar Net Metering

Sacramento, CA—The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) released a revised proposed decision today on solar net energy metering. Though the proposal avoids unfair and illegal solar taxes and fees, it would make solar less affordable by reducing the credit consumers receive for contributing their excess solar energy back to the power grid, known as export rates. 

The solar industry and clean energy supporters are still reviewing the CPUC’s proposed decision, but based on an initial analysis it would cut the average export rate in California from $0.30 per kilowatt to $0.08 per kilowatt and make those cuts effective in April 2023, resulting in a 75 percent reduction in value of exports.   

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) issued the following statement on the CPUC’s proposed decision: 

The CPUC’s new proposed decision would really hurt. It needs more work or it will replace the solar tax with a steep solar decline. An immediate 75 percent reduction of net energy metering credits does not support a growing solar market in California. 

If passed as is, the CPUC’s proposal would protect utility monopolies and boost their profits, while making solar less affordable and delaying the goal of 100 percent clean energy. 

California needs more solar power and more solar-charged batteries, not less. 

We urge Governor Newsom and the CPUC to make further adjustments to help more middle- and working-class consumers as well as schools and farms access affordable, reliable, clean energy. 

Background:

The CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during recent heat waves. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC’s proposed decision released last December would have implemented a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy. 

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom.

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the CPUC to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers. More than 160,000 people submitted comments to the CPUC and Governor Newsom calling for a strong NEM-3 decision, the highest count in CPUC history.

###

About CALSSA

The California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) has advanced the common interest of the solar and storage industry for over 40 years, making California the most robust market in the U.S. The association is the state’s largest clean energy business group with over 700 member companies representing an array of businesses that manufacture, design, install, finance and provide other resources to the growing local solar and storage market in California. Learn more at www.calssa.org.

Solar Supporters Urge CA Public Utilities Commission to Keep Rooftop Solar Growing and Affordable at Meeting in Chico

CHICO—Over 50 local solar supporters turned out to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) meeting in Chico on Thursday, urging commissioners to keep rooftop solar growing and affordable. 

Solar is currently growing fastest in working and middle class neighborhoods and helping to advance California’s race to clean energy. That progress is threatened by utility-backed efforts in the California Public Utilities Commission to reduce competition by making solar unaffordable for most consumers through changes to a popular state policy called “net energy metering.” Net energy metering makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Here are some highlighted news clips from the November 3 hearing:

You can view the entire database of news clips from the hearing here.
………

CPUC Net Energy Metering Proceeding Background:

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is considering changes to net energy metering, the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during the recent heat wave. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC’s proposed decision released last December would have implemented a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy. 

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. A new proposal from the CPUC could come as soon as mid-November. 

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the CPUC to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers.

Coalition Celebrates Diverse Support for Rooftop Solar Energy and Urges Governor Newsom to Keep Solar Growing for Everyone in California

SACRAMENTO—Over a thousand solar supporters, representing a diverse coalition from all over California, gathered at the state capitol for an “Everyone Under the Sun Festival and Rally” to celebrate California’s clean energy progress and urge Governor Newsom to keep solar growing for California energy consumers in all communities.

Photo by Ricky Mackie. View all event photos here.

The event featured performances by James Jackson & All Stars Gospel Choir, Mariachi Nuevo Mexico de Sacramento, Keen Khmer Ballet, Aztec Dancers, and the Grammy-Award winning band Ozomatli, along with remarks from notable climate advocacy and social justice leaders. During the event, participants created a 480-foot long painted billboard on 10th street with a pro-solar message for Governor Newsom, and displayed a giant 40x70 foot flag with a “keep solar growing for all” message on the lawn in front of the state capitol building. 

Photo by Jason Vetterli. View all event photos here.

Solar is currently growing fastest in working and middle class neighborhoods and helping to advance California’s race to clean energy. That progress is threatened by utility-backed efforts in the California Public Utilities Commission to reduce competition by making solar unaffordable for most consumers through changes to a popular state policy called “net energy metering.” Net energy metering makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Event Quotes: 

“It's no accident that California is the nation’s solar leader, with now a million and a half solar rooftops; it's the direct result of state action to promote and grow clean energy; and this is no time to abandon the mantle of leadership,” said Laura Deehan, Environment California State Director. “We need four times as much rooftop solar if we want to protect our climate and our environment; let’s not get rid of solar incentives that help us reach that goal. Let’s reject solar taxes and go much further in supporting adoption of this critical clean energy technology.”

“State leaders are kidding themselves if they think we can meet our clean energy goals entirely with remote solar farms and new power lines, especially as we add millions of electric vehicles in communities throughout the state,” said Brad Heavner, policy director of the California Solar & Storage Association. “We need local power, and a new tax on solar would be the wrong direction for California.”

“To achieve true energy equity, we need to allow people to come together to share resources to create better solutions for everyone,” said Crystal Huang, Co-Founder  of the People Power Solar Cooperative. “We need strong energy policies that allow decision-making and ownership of energy resources to stay in the community rather than in remote corporate boardrooms. For the safety, health, and well-being of our communities, it's time to move toward a decentralized energy model that advances community-centered policy and expands access to distributed energy resources, like rooftop solar and community-owned solar, storage, and microgrids. This transition must prioritize  community-owned and public renewable energy projects developed by cooperatives, municipalities, and nonprofits that build shared wealth and decision-making power for BIPOC and low-income communities who are disproportionately harmed by the extractive energy economy.” 

“Fifteen years ago, you had to be very wealthy to access solar. Today, one and a half million Californians have access to solar on their rooftops. Those Californians are out on the streets with us today, urging Gov. Newsom to keep solar growing for everyone under the sun,” said Dave Rosenfeld, Executive Director, Solar Rights Alliance. “We represent the voices of consumers, farmers, tenants, solar workers, small business owners, and climate advocates, calling on California to expand access to clean energy for all its residents and communities. Our coalition isn’t powered by investor-owned interests, greed, or preserving the status quo—it’s powered by people.”

CPUC Net Energy Metering Proceeding Background:

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is considering changes to net energy metering, the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during the recent heat wave. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC’s proposed decision released last December would have implemented a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy. 

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom.

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the CPUC to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers.

Video Clips from Everyone Under the Sun Rally & Festival

About Save California Solar
Save California Solar is a coalition formed to help ensure that rooftop solar continues to grow and benefit every Californian. Save CA Solar includes more than 600 diverse organizations and helped generate 150,000+ public comments submitted in support of net metering ahead of the CPUC proposed decision. Learn more at www.savecaliforniasolar.org

CALSSA Statement on Governor Newsom’s Climate Change Legislation

“Meeting the goal of 90 percent clean energy is impossible without a lot more rooftop solar.” 

Sacramento, CA—Today Governor Newsom signed a package of legislation aimed at addressing climate change, including advancing California’s clean energy goal to 90% clean electricity by 2035. Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) issued the following statement:

We enthusiastically applaud Governor Newsom for his leadership in fighting climate change and for setting goals that move California toward a clean energy future. 

By all measures, meeting the goal of 90 percent clean energy by 2035 is absolutely impossible without a lot more rooftop solar installed at homes, apartments, businesses, churches and schools around the state. That is why we also commend Governor Newsom for his opposition earlier this year to a proposal from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) that would have slammed the brakes on California’s solar progress by taxing it and making it unaffordable for most consumers. 

With new commissioners and leadership in place at the CPUC, we are hopeful for a proposal that follows Governor Newsom’s lead and keeps rooftop solar and storage accelerating in order to advance, not hinder, California’s race to clean energy in the fight against climate change. 

CPUC Net Energy Metering Proceeding Background:

The CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. Together, these distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during last week’s heat wave. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and maintain the need for costly and often dangerous transmission lines that are a key driver of utility profits and ratepayer costs. 

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC’s proposed decision released late last year would have implemented a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy.  

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved for an indefinite amount of time earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. The CPUC then issued a ruling to re-open its net energy metering proceeding. Based on the 90 day window that began with the July 1, 2022 deadline for intervenor comments on the CPUC’s proceeding, a new proposed decision is expected to be released on or before September 29, 2022. 

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the CPUC to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers

Distributed Sun-Charged Batteries Helped Grid During California Heat Wave, Again

This week’s record-breaking heat wave stressed California’s electric grid but, once again, distributed customer-sited batteries, charged up by solar panels, helped keep the lights on.

An analysis by the California Solar and Storage Association (CALSSA) shows that California had more than 80,000 customer-sited batteries connected to the electric grid capable of providing 900 MW of solar power.

While not all the batteries were set to discharge during the peak hours of 4pm-9pm on September 6, an estimated 76% were, which as a fleet, were capable of providing up to 684 MW of power at any given moment. We estimate that 50% of these batteries’ aggregate power was put into use during peak hours, providing approximately 340 MW of power. To put this into perspective, a mid-sized natural gas power plant is 250 MW.

When California suffered rolling blackouts in August 2020, California had 30,000 distributed batteries with the potential to discharge 500 MW of power. In just two years, 50,000 consumers added 400 MW of clean sun-charged battery power. The current 900 MW of distributed batteries in California is nearly the size of Diablo Canyon’s Unit 1.

“The biggest battery in the world is located in garages around California and they are helping keep the lights on for everyone,” said Bernadette Del Chiaro, CALSSA executive director. “While it goes largely unrecognized by utilities and grid operators, these consumer investments in clean energy played a crucial role during this week’s heat wave helping keep the lights on not just for the homeowners and businesses who made the investment but for everyone.”

Consumer batteries charged by on-site solar panels can be pre-programmed to discharge at set times and on set days. The most common setting is for the battery to charge up in the morning, as soon as the solar panels start to generate electricity, and then discharge starting at 4pm, 5pm or 6pm depending on local utility rates and consumer settings. Once discharging, the batteries cover on-site load, helping relieve strain on the grid, or in the case of a net metered battery, can export power to a neighbor. 

“Solar and storage homes and businesses are like Flex Alert superheroes. They not only reduce strain on the grid, they can go a step further and share surplus electrons with their neighbors,” said Del Chiaro.

CALSSA estimates that California utilities, purchasing electricity on the spot market on Tuesday, spent an extra $450 million compared to a “normal” hot day the previous week. $450 million spent on consumer batteries instead would be an investment in a resource that lasts 10-15 years, as opposed to one day.

Programs that operate distributed behind-the-meter batteries like a virtual power plant, dispatching an aggregated fleet of small batteries on command, pinpointed to the exact time and location where the grid needs the electricity most, have also been proven effective. Several companies have fleets of these batteries located on customer properties and enrolled in programs such as the Emergency Load Reduction Program (ELRP). Tesla, for example, had 4,500 consumer batteries that, in the aggregate, discharged 32 MW during peak hours on September 6, 2022.

Pilot programs like these are proof that customer-sited batteries can be relied upon during grid emergencies, a concern utilities and grid-operators often cite as a reason to not support policies to deploy more of them.

“As our electricity needs grow, California should encourage consumers to build sun-charged batteries everywhere,” said Del Chiaro. “The instinct of the utility is to keep everything under their control and limited it to what they need today instead of planning ahead and riding the wave of the future.”

CALSSA is calling on policy makers and regulators to recognize the enormous value and potential of distributed customer-sited sun-charged batteries and amplify various policy tools to accelerate their adoption. First and foremost, CALSSA continues its call on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to not tax solar panels and the batteries they charge via the so-called “NEM-3” decision and to ensure a smooth transition to an all solar battery future.

“We have built 1.5 million solar roofs to date,” said Del Chiaro. “Our next horizon is to build 1.5 million sun-charged batteries. We can get there with policies that work with consumers, not against them. Distributed solar and storage may not fit neatly into the investor-owned utility business model but, frankly, rolling blackouts, or even just the threat of them, don’t fit the California economy.”  

“Don’t Tax the Sun” Tour Crossing California: Solar Supporters Protest to Stop Solar Tax Proposal that Boosts Utility Profits at the Expense of Clean Energy Needs 

CALIFORNIA—Solar workers, consumers, clean energy advocates, community leaders, conservationists, and climate activists are rallying at investor-owned utilities across the state over the next two weeks to protest a utility-backed proposal to tax rooftop solar and drastically reduce the credits consumers receive for selling their solar energy back to the grid. 

 

Save California Solar Coalition partners and protesters, along with tv news crews gather in front of the headquarters of Sempra in San Diego, the parent company of San Diego Gas & Electric on Tuesday, July 19.

 

The tour goes from July 19 to July 29 and includes stops at utility offices in San Diego, the Coachella Valley, Bakersfield, San Luis Obispo, Fresno, Santa Cruz and Chico.During the events solar advocates will deliver “cease and desist” letters to California’s investor owned utilities, calling on them to stop trying to make solar unaffordable and halt California’s clean energy progress. 

 

Save California Solar Coalition partners and protesters, along with tv news crews gather in front of PG&E in Bakersfield on Thursday, July 21.

 

The CPUC is currently considering utility-proposed changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and maintain the need for costly and often dangerous transmission lines that are a key driver of utility profits and ratepayer costs. 

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC is considering a proposed decision, favored by investor-owned utilities, to implement a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy.  

The CPUC proposed drastic changes that favored the utilities last December and are expected to issue a revised decision sometime next month.

By contrast, solar supporters want to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers, ensure California remains on track with its clean energy and land conservation goals, and accelerate the growth of solar plus storage to build a more resilient electric grid.

“Don’t Tax the Sun” rally on July 26 in San Luis Obispo. The group marched to PG&E’s office on Higuera Street. Credit: Paso Robles Daily News

Solar Supporters Rally in LA and San Francisco to Stop CPUC’s Latest Solar Tax Proposal that Boosts Utility Profits at the Expense of Clean Energy Needs

“Don’t Tax the Sun” events are part of the largest ever submission of live and video-recorded public comments in CPUC history

Nearly 1000 solar supporters gathered on the steps of the CPUC on Thursday to give public testimony.

CALIFORNIA—Thousands of solar workers, consumers, clean energy advocates, community leaders, conservationists, and climate activists rallied on Thursday to protest the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) latest proposal to tax rooftop solar and drastically reduce the credits consumers receive for selling their solar energy back to the grid. Solar supporters held simultaneous actions in Los Angeles and at the CPUC headquarters in San Francisco. 

Hundreds more gathered in LA to give public testimony live on stage and via video which will be submitted to the CPUC public record.

In San Francisco hundreds of solar supporters lined-up at the CPUC headquarters to deliver public comments. In Los Angeles, solar supporters gave “public comments” on stage to a mock dais of CPUC commissioners, while hundreds of attendees recorded their own video testimonials to submit to the CPUC. Combined, Thursday’s actions are the largest ever submission of live and video-recorded public comments in CPUC history.

The CPUC is currently considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and maintain the need for costly and often dangerous transmission lines that are a key driver of utility profits and ratepayer costs. 

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC is considering a proposed decision, favored by investor-owned utilities, to implement a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy.  

The CPUC had previously proposed a similar steep tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits of solar consumers. The unpopular proposed decision was shelved for an indefinite amount of time earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. The CPUC’s recent ruling to re-open its net energy metering procedures seems again to be pursuing a tax, this time hidden and under a different name.

By contrast, solar supporters want to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers, ensure California remains on track with its clean energy and land conservation goals, and accelerate the growth of solar plus storage to build a more resilient electric grid.

CALSSA Statement on CPUC Reopening NEM 3 and Pushing Back a Decision Until at least July

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) announced today it is “reopening the record” on its net energy metering “NEM 3” proceeding, in order to gather information on some specific elements of the decision. The record reopening delays a proposed decision from the CPUC on NEM 3 until July at the earliest. 

For over a year the CPUC has considered changes to net energy metering backed by utility interests. The CPUC’s initial proposed decision, which included a steep tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits solar consumers receive, would have made solar unaffordable for most consumers, especially those in working and middle class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest. It would also hurt the commercial, government and agricultural solar markets. The unpopular proposed decision was shelved for an indefinite amount of time after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. 

Now, as the CPUC reopens the process for considering policy changes to rooftop solar, the stakes are coming into heightened focus. California is expecting summer power shortages and blackouts due to both limited supplies of energy and growing demand for electricity, to the extent that Governor Newsom may reverse plans to shut down the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. As a superior, no-regrets solution, solar advocates are calling for a new proposed decision that keeps solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers, ensures California remains on track with its clean energy and land conservation goals, and accelerates the growth of solar plus storage to build a more resilient electric grid. Solar supporters note California built the equivalent capacity of two Diablo Canyon-sized power plants through rooftop solar between 2017 and 2021 and can repeat that progress by 2024, unless regulators make changes that undermine the rooftop solar market. 

The distributed storage market is also significant with more than 800 MW of storage installed to date and more than 1 gigawatt of additional energy storage expected by 2024. Together, this is nearly the equivalent storage capacity of both Diablo Canyon reactors. 

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association issued the following statement on today’s ruling from the CPUC administrative law judge on the NEM 3 record reopening: 

“Our large and diverse coalition of solar supporters is glad the CPUC recognized just how far out of step the first proposed decision was with California’s clean energy goals and equity values. Californians strongly support rooftop solar and will not accept a decision that taxes the sun or slows our state’s clean energy progress by making solar unaffordable.  

At the same time, we know utility special interests have a lot of power and a significant profit motive in stopping competition from rooftop solar. And, to be clear, a solar tax appears to still be on the table. We will continue to make sure no one is fooled again by the utility profit grab that makes electricity more expensive for everyone and halts California’s grid resilience and clean energy progress.” 

###

Florida Governor DeSantis Vetoes Bill to Make Rooftop Solar Unaffordable

Sacramento, CA—On Wednesday, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis vetoed legislation, backed by investor-owned utilities in the state, to change “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

In his veto message, Governor DeSantis said the legislation, which aimed to “recover lost [utility] revenues resulting from residential solar generation” and also increases costs on all energy consumers, would contribute to the inflationary  “financial crunch” Floridians are experiencing.  

For the past year California’s Public Utility Commission CPUC has considered similar changes to net energy metering also backed by utility interests. The CPUC’s initial proposed decision, which included a $700 annual tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits solar consumers receive, would have made solar unaffordable for most consumers, especially those in working and middle class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest. The unpopular proposed decision was shelved for an indefinite amount of time after intense backlash. 

Now, as the CPUC reconsiders rooftop solar changes, solar advocates are calling for a new proposed decision that keeps solar affordable for all types of consumers, ensures California remains on track with its clean energy and land conservation goals, and promotes the growth of solar and storage to build a more resilient electric grid. 

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association issued the following statement on Governor DeSantis’ veto: 

Governor DeSantis did not fall for the utilities’ playbook of protecting their profits and monopolies by eliminating competition from rooftop solar. Governor Newsom’s administration should not fall for it either. When it comes to keeping solar affordable, growing, and contributing to our clean energy future, California should be not only keeping pace with Florida, but leading the world.  

###

Solar Supporters Stage “Phone-In” Outside CPUC

As Net-Energy Metering 3.0 proceedings enter second year of deliberation, solar consumers, workers, and environmentalists are calling for answers and transparency 

SAN FRANCISCO—Solar supporters staged a live “phone-in” on the steps of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) headquarters, during Thursday’s virtual meeting, seeking answers about a rooftop solar proceeding that has largely occurred out of public view.

Over the past year, the CPUC has considered changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. The CPUC’s initial proposed decision, which included a $700 annual tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits solar consumers receive, would have made solar unaffordable for most consumers, especially those in working and middle class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest. 

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved after intense backlash from environmentalists, conservationists, affordable housing advocates, civil rights leaders, justice advocates, along with solar consumers, workers and small businesses who rejected it as a total giveaway to investor-owned utilities that would have boosted utility profits at the expense of all consumers, tens of thousands of jobs, and California’s clean energy future.

“For a year now, a diverse coalition of organizations, leaders, consumers, and workers have spoken up for solar, to make sure California stays a solar state,” said Dave Rosenfeld, Director of the Solar Rights Alliance. “As these proceedings enter their second year, we want the CPUC and Governor Newsom to understand just how unpopular the idea of putting utility profits over people is in California.”

Now, as the CPUC reconsiders rooftop solar changes, solar advocates are seeking transparency in the process and answers. During Thursday’s “phone-in,” hundreds of solar supporters around the state waited on-hold to make public comments during the CPUC’s virtual meeting. Outside CPUC headquarters, dozens of activists also called into the meeting while holding signs with questions for the CPUC like  “what about real energy equity”, “what about climate leadership”, and “what about getting to 100% renewable”.    

“Let’s be clear: this is a debate about energy democracy vs. energy monopoly,” said Esperanza Vielma, Executive Director, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water. “Big utilities want to protect their control over energy delivery to protect their billions in profit. The environmental justice community wants energy equity where people are free to generate and distribute their own energy in ways that are cleaner and more affordable. It’s really not that hard for the CPUC to be on the right side of history.”

The CPUC phone-in action follows large scale rallies and marches with thousands of solar workers and solar advocates protesting against the proposed decision at CPUC offices in Los Angeles and San Francisco. Previously, solar advocates formed a human billboard at the State Capitol in Sacramento and wrote a “Solar, Not Oil” message to Governor Newson in the sand on Huntington Beach.

“Our power doesn’t come from money and political influence, it comes from our diverse coalition representing the needs and desires of environmentalists, conservationists, farmers, students, disabled communities, renters, churches, schools, labor, and small businesses across the state,” said Jessica Tovar, Energy Democracy Organizer with the Local Clean Energy Alliance. “Our grassroots coalition represents California voters from all walks of life, who overwhelmingly support the growth of local solar and oppose the push by investor-owned utilities to increase their profits by making solar more expensive for everyone.”

Recent polling shows the continued popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, along with the extreme unpopularity of CPUC’s proposed decision. Support for protecting rooftop solar is also reflected in endorsements by the Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Sacramento Bee, Santa Cruz Sentinel, and San Luis Obispo Tribune editorial boards. 

“To ensure the transition to a clean energy economy truly benefits our communities, we need net energy metering in combination with strong energy policies that allow decision-making and ownership of energy resources to stay in the community rather than in remote corporate boardrooms,” said People Power Solar Cooperative Co-Founder and CEO Crystal Huang, “Limiting net energy metering will hurt our ability to create opportunities for our communities to share wealth and activate the transition to a regenerative energy economy.”

The Save CA Solar coalition will continue calling on the CPUC to find a better way to support solar in California, including encouraging Governor Newsom to step in with a solution that keeps solar affordable, saves solar jobs and keeps California on the path to 100% clean energy.

Twenty-Two California Legislators Call on CPUC to Keep Rooftop Solar Growing and Affordable

“We are confident that a reconsidered, modernized NEM proposal will strike the balance of expanding access to rooftop solar and energy storage.”

CALIFORNIA—A group of twenty California State Legislators—comprising both Senators and Assemblymembers from both political parties—urged the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to keep solar growing, affordable, and in line with California’s clean energy goals, in a letter issued to Alice Reynolds, Chair of the CPUC this week. 

Referencing the CPUC’s “proposed decision on current net energy metering (NEM),” the state legislators lauded the CPUC’s “desire to adhere to the ‘guiding principles’ of sustainable growth amongst all ratepayers”, as well as “expanded clean energy access to low-income and environmental justice communities”, but expressed deep concerns over specific elements of the proposed decision.

In the letter, California legislators noted that a monthly solar fee could “significantly depress the clean energy market, negatively impact California-based businesses and jobs, and impact the availability of much needed affordable housing.” They added that this fee, along with a 70-80% cut in solar energy credits would effectively penalize families, educational, non-profit, and agricultural institutions investing in energy and storage to help California meet its clean energy future. 

“We are confident that a reconsidered, modernized NEM proposal will strike the balance of expanding access to rooftop solar and energy storage, while maintaining the structure needed to continue to build a more resilient, equitable, and clean electric grid,” the letter concluded. 

State Senator Nancy Skinner and Assemblymember Cristina Garcia also sent individual letters to the CPUC earlier this year urging the commission to protect rooftop solar in California, expressing concerns over creating economic and environmental setbacks for California’s consumers and exacerbating inequities in access to clean energy. 

The letter from California state legislators follows a recent congressional letter to the CPUC from twenty-six California members of congress in support of rooftop solar that said, “imposing a tax on solar panels and reducing the rate of solar power exports by as much as 80 percent would label California as a climate straggler, not a climate leader.” They also expressed concern that the proposed decision runs counter to federal renewable energy policies and “would reportedly cut California’s rooftop solar market in half by 2024.” 

The CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar and storage more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.3 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today. 

Recent polling shows the continued popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, along with the extreme unpopularity of CPUC’s proposed decision. Support for protecting rooftop solar is also reflected in endorsements by the Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Sacramento Bee, Santa Cruz Sentinel, and San Luis Obispo Tribune editorial boards.

The CPUC delayed consideration of its proposed decision indefinitely following intense backlash from solar consumers, solar workers, small businesses, faith leaders, affordable housing advocates, environmentalists and conservation groups. 

The twenty State Legislators from California who signed on to the letter to CPUC Chair Alice Reynolds, dated March 14th, include:

  • Senator Josh Becker

  • Senator John Laird

  • Assemblymember Phil Ting

  • Assemblymember Jordan Cunningham

  • Assemblymember James Gallagher

  • Assemblymember Marc Berman

  • Assemblymember Dr. Akilah Weber

  • Assemblymember Marc Levine

  • Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin 

  • Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel

  • Senator Scott Weiner

  • Senator Mike Mcguire

  • Assemblymember Jim Wood

  • Assemblymember Phillip Chen

  • Assemblymember Al Muratsutchi

  • Assemblymember Christopher Ward

  • Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian

  • Assemblymember Buffy Wicks

  • Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan

  • Assemblymember Evan Low

CALSSA Statement on California Energy Commission’s Announcement on California’s Clean Energy Progress

Sacramento, CA—Today, the California Energy Commission (CEC) announced progress in meeting the state’s 100% clean energy goals ahead of schedule. California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) executive director Bernadette Del Chiaro issued the following statement in response:

California should be proud of its clean energy leadership, and we have the California Energy Commission to thank for much of that progress. However, with less than 35% of our electricity coming from renewable resources today, it is premature to celebrate, and especially so as utilities continue their attack on California’s renewable energy bright spot: rooftop solar.

California policy makers should be sounding the alarm and calling for all-hands-on-deck action to double our renewable energy resources by 2025, and doubling them again by 2030, as called for by the Biden Administration last year.

It took California 20 years to generate 35% of its electricity from renewable resources like solar and wind power. State law dictates we at least double that, hitting 60% renewables in less than 10 years, by 2030. And, climate science dictates the goalposts of getting to 100% carbon-free energy should be moved way up from the current 2045 timeframe.

Complicating matters, demand for electricity is expected to increase significantly as more consumers switch to electric cars and appliances making those higher benchmarks even harder to hit. Further, the state’s last remaining nuclear power plant is scheduled to close in 2024 and the prolonged drought is severely limiting hydro power.  

All of these dynamics mean California needs to pick up the pace on renewable energy development more than ever before.

Meanwhile, rooftop solar, which continues to grow especially among middle- and working-class communities and added more than a nuclear-power plant worth of renewable energy last year, is under attack. Investor-owned utilities, led by PG&E, view rooftop solar as a competitive threat to their monopoly business model. They have launched a well-funded attack campaign to blame rooftop solar users for rising energy costs when research shows building distributed generation like rooftop solar and batteries is key to both controlling costs and creating greater grid reliability.

A California study put out by the California Public Utilities Commission last year showed utility profit and uncontrolled utility spending is squarely to blame for rising costs. When California voters are asked what they believe is causing rate increases, rooftop solar is listed last, by just 11%, well behind utility companies seeking to maintain of boost their profits (51%), managing wildfire danger (41%), grid maintenance (33%), and the cost of building new electric transmission lines (15%).

Data presented in today’s announcement by the Commission shows utility-scale renewable energy has not grown significantly for several years. The document cites the data as “Renewable Portfolio Standard-eligible resources” which typically does not include rooftop solar, or distributed generation, built and maintained by consumers.

 
 

Rooftop solar, by contrast, is California’s renewable energy bright spot, adding over 1.5 GWs of energy in 2021 alone as the data from the state-run website “DG Stats” shows.  

 

As the California Public Utilities Commission continues to deliberate the so-called “NEM-3” proceeding, CALSSA joins with 140,000 California voters, over 600 faith, community, environmental, and equity organizations, and countless elected officials in calling on Governor Gavin Newsom to protect the rights of consumers to invest in rooftop solar, rejecting the “solar tax”, and making sure rooftop solar remains affordable for working- and middle-class consumers in the years to come.

 

CALSSA Statement on CPUC Net Metering Decision Delay

Sacramento, CA— California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) executive director, Bernadette Del Chiaro issued the following statement on the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) apparent further delay on the net metering 3.0 proceeding: 

Solar supporters of all types are relieved it looks as though the CPUC is throwing its unpopular proposed decision in the trash can where it belongs and is hopefully now taking time to go back to the drawing board. 

The December 13 proposed decision was a total giveaway to investor-owned utilities that would have boosted utility profits at the expense of all consumers, tens of thousands of jobs, and California’s clean energy future. A $700 annual tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits solar consumers received would make solar unaffordable for most consumers, especially those in working and middle class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest. 

We urge the CPUC to listen to the huge and wide-ranging coalition of energy consumers, solar workers, affordable housing advocates, faith leaders, environmentalists, and conservationists who fought back against the utility-driven attempt to stop competition from rooftop solar. 

Any revised proposal that includes a discriminatory tax or fees of any size on solar consumers, or that makes rooftop solar and storage unaffordable to most consumers with drastic and sudden changes to the compensation they receive for selling their excess energy back to the grid, will be met with even louder disapproval. 

Rooftop solar and storage are one of California’s bright spots and they must continue to grow with a strong NEM 3 decision. California is a solar state to its core and we will not let big utilities block out our sun. 

Background on Net Metering

CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar and storage more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.3 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

New Poll Shows CPUC’s Proposal to Tax Solar and Slash Incentives is Extremely Unpopular with California Voters

“It is clear that any proposal including a tax on rooftop solar is going to be a non-starter with California voters.”

CALIFORNIA— A new poll released today shows the California Public Utilities Commission’s proposed decision on rooftop solar net metering is extremely unpopular with California voters. 

Consistent with previous opinion research, rooftop solar is held in especially high esteem in the sunshine state. According to the poll, a supermajority—85 percent—of likely 2022 voters want California to do more, or about the same as it currently does, to encourage the use of solar power. Strong majority support for encouraging solar is found among Democrats, Independents, and Republicans. 

When asked about net metering, the policy responsible for making solar affordable by crediting solar customers for the excess energy they produce and send back to the grid, 78 percent of voters express support. Not surprisingly then, nearly two thirds of voters—62 percent—oppose a proposal to “add a new fixed monthly fee on most people who install rooftop solar and reduce the credit” they receive for their extra energy.

“Governor Newsom recently said ‘there’s more work to be done’ on the CPUC’s proposal. While we really appreciate his acknowledgement, it might be the understatement of the year based on how toxic the proposal is,” said Bernadette Del Chiaro, Executive Director of the California Solar & Storage Association. “It is clear that any proposal including a tax on rooftop solar is going to be a non-starter with California voters.”  

The poll was conducted as the California Public Utilities Commission gets ready to vote on a net metering proposal that solar advocates hope is a dramatic improvement from the initial proposed decision. The proposed decision released by the CPUC in December would implement a monthly penalty fee on solar consumers, adding up to nearly $700 a year, while slashing credits for solar consumers by 80 percent on average. The proposal is being met with intense opposition from environmentalists, conservationists, affordable housing advocates, civil rights leaders, along with solar consumers, workers and small businesses. An expected vote on the current proposed decision was recently delayed by the CPUC.  

Voters predict a grim outlook for energy bills, solar growth, and fighting climate change if a change along the lines of the CPUC’s proposed decision is passed. A majority of voters believe the changes to net metering will increase their electric bill. 64 percent of property owners without solar currently would be less likely to consider solar installation with the proposed changes. 65 percent of property owners currently with solar said they would be less likely to install solar if they moved to a new home. Nearly half of voters surveyed said net metering changes will actually slow down California’s progress in combating climate change. 

Despite an extended advertising campaign, voters are not buying the message from utility special interests that solar users are to blame for energy rate hikes. That reason is supported by just 11 percent of voters and the lowest of all options provided in the survey including the costs of building new electric transmission lines (15 percent), grid maintenance (33 percent), managing wildfire danger (41 percent), and utility companies seeking to maintain or boost their profits (51 percent). 

“California voters are no fools. They love rooftop solar and they know utilities who try to convince them otherwise do not really have the interest of consumers, climate or clean energy in mind,” said Dave Rosenfeld, Executive Director of the Solar Rights Alliance. “Californians understand utilities have a profit motive in killing off solar compensation. And you cannot blame voters for their distrust of big utilities like PG&E which caused California’s second largest fire in state history and was found guilty of 84 felony counts of involuntary manslaughter, to say nothing of their continual bill increases.” 

When provided both the perspectives of rooftop solar advocates and utility interests, most sided with solar:

The poll was conducted by Benenson Strategy Group and included 887 interviews with likely 2022 voters in California from January 15-19, 2022. Interviews were conducted using SMS text-to-web services, on landline phones, and with online panels. The sample was weighted to ensure it was proportionally representative of likely 2022 voters in California. The margin of sampling error is ±3.29% for the full sample at the 95% confidence level.

Senate Passes Senator Wiener’s Legislation to Implement Automated Solar Permitting

SB 379 — the Solar Access Act — requires California cities to provide online, instant solar permitting to streamline remote approvals

SACRAMENTO – Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco)’s legislation, Senate Bill 379, the Solar Access Act, has passed the Senate by a bipartisan vote of 31-1. It now moves to the Assembly to be heard in policy committees. SB 379 implements instant, online solar permitting in counties with over 150,000 residents. This legislation will greatly decrease approval times for residential solar and solar-plus-storage systems, cut permitting costs for local governments and homeowners, and help California meet its greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. SB 379 is co-sponsored by SPUR and Environment California.

Climate change is a dire threat, and California must accelerate its transition to clean energy in order to meet its target to become carbon neutral by 2045. Widespread installation of residential solar systems has helped push California towards these goals. However, while the cost of solar technology has decreased in recent years, the high costs associated with installation — including local permitting and inspection requirements — have remained prohibitive for many. Delays due to long permit and inspection wait times also hurt solar implementation across the state. Automated permitting solves both of these issues; the Solar Access Act will allow California to implement a timely and comprehensive solution.

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), a project within the U.S. Department of Energy, has created a free-to-use program to support local governments with residential solar and solar-plus-storage system permitting. SolarAPP+ provides a web-based portal that streamlines and automates permit reviews, and can be easily implemented into existing local government permitting software. The Solar Access Act requires counties with more than 150,000 residents, and all cities within those counties, to implement instant online permitting for solar and solar-plus-storage systems, via programs like SolarAPP+. The requirement will go into effect starting September 30, 2024 for cities under 50,000 residents, and September 30, 2023 for cities over 50,000 residents. The California Energy Commission (CEC) is preparing a program to deploy $20 million in grants to help cities and counties adopt online automated permitting systems such as SolarAPP+.

NREL first introduced SolarAPP+ in late 2020 and has slowly expanded the program’s capabilities. Many local jurisdictions, including Pleasant Hill, Sonoma County, San Jose, and Los Angeles have already begun implementation of automated permitting with great success. Pleasant Hill has reduced their average permit review time to zero days (same-day approval) since adopting SolarAPP+ for instantaneous automated permitting.

“Automated solar permitting is a powerful tool to help residents get solar on rooftops faster and cheaper,” said Senator Wiener. “SB 379’s passage through the Senate is a strong indication of our state’s commitment to meeting and surpassing our clean energy goals now and in the future.”

Solar Workers and Supporters Rally and March in Los Angeles and San Francisco to Save Solar Jobs from Utility Profit Grab

The CPUC’s proposed decision under consideration would tax rooftop solar customers and reduce compensation for clean energy, threatening 50,000+ family-supporting green jobs and derailing California’s clean energy progress 

CALIFORNIA—Thousands of solar workers joined solar consumers, housing advocates, faith leaders, environmentalists, conservationists, and climate activists today to make their voices heard in a statewide effort to save more than 50,000 family-supporting green jobs in the rooftop solar industry. Workers and supporters held simultaneous rallies and marches to California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) buildings in Los Angeles and San Francisco. 

1200+ solar workers and supporters descend on the CPUC in downtown San Francisco

Solar jobs are threatened due to a recent proposed decision by the CPUC on the future of “net metering.” Net metering is the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers, particularly in middle and working class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest, by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. The CPUC proposed decision would make solar unaffordable for most consumers, threatening jobs and small businesses throughout the state, by imposing a new $684 a year solar tax and slashing consumer credits for solar by 80%.

In San Francisco, a rally took place at the center strip of Civic Center Plaza near City Hall, before solar workers and consumers, housing advocates, faith leaders, environmentalists, conservationists, and climate activists marched to the CPUC headquarters. In Los Angeles, solar workers and supporters rallied at the Grant Park performance lawn before a march with banners, hand-held signs and balloons to CPUC’s downtown office. Both rallies were joined by solar workers and advocates from across the state, rallying to stop a prohibitive tax on solar and protect local jobs.

1500+ solar workers and supporters gathered in downtown Los Angeles at Grand Park, before marching to the LA PUC building.

“This proposed decision completely reverses California’s progress on clean energy and green jobs,” said Bernadette Del Chiaro, Executive Director of California Solar & Storage Association. “The thousands of hard working men and women who provide clean, reliable energy for millions of consumers came out here today to fight for their jobs, for affordable and clean energy, and for their state to get back on track as a solar leader.”

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar in California, and the strong public support for programs to increase solar energy in California, the CPUC is proposing a giveaway to investor-owned utilities that would boost utility profits at the expense of energy consumers, green jobs, and California’s clean energy future. PG&E and other big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and maintain the need for costly and often dangerous transmission lines that are a key driver of utility profits and ratepayer costs. 

If utilities get their way, solar will become unaffordable for most middle and working class consumers, costing tens of thousands of solar jobs, making California more vulnerable to fires and blackouts, and derailing California’s clean energy progress needed to fight climate change.

“I’ve seen my colleagues and I work hard to keep the lights on across the state during the pandemic,” said Ferrer Sanders, a solar worker with A1 Sun in the Bay Area. “This proposed decision feels like a punch in the gut for local solar workers who are working every day to keep communities safe and electrified. We should be making solar more affordable, and not less, for everyone.”

“My job is among tens of thousands of jobs on the line,” said Joel Ellazar, a solar worker at HES Solar who traveled to LA from the San Diego area. “California’s leadership has the opportunity to support the lives and livelihoods of solar workers, small businesses, and communities today, or watch utilities destroy the progress we have made over the years.”

The Save CA Solar coalition, which includes more than 600 diverse organizations, has helped generate 120,000+ public comments submitted in support of net metering ahead of the CPUC proposed decision. The coalition will continue calling on the CPUC to find a better way to support solar in California ahead of the final vote, including encouraging Governor Newsom to step in with a solution that saves solar jobs and keeps California on the path to 100% clean energy.

“For the last year, a diverse coalition of organizations, leaders, consumers, and workers have kept speaking up for solar, and to make sure California stays a solar state,” said Dave Rosenfeld, Director of the Solar Rights Alliance. “We want the CPUC and Governor Newsom to understand just how unpopular the idea of putting utility profits over people is in California.”

The CPUC will hold a final vote on the future of net metering following a 25-day comment period on the proposed decision and alternative proposals. The current proposal is set for a vote on January 27 but that date could be moved if an alternate decision is proposed. The proposed changes to net metering could go into effect as early as this Spring.  

TV News Clips of the Jan 13 rallies from Around the State

We received a lot of local coverage. You can view the full database of clips, or here are a few curated clips from around the state:

CBSN Bay Area

Spectrum 1 in LA.

NBC in Santa Cruz/ Monterey

ABC 10 in San Diego

KTVU 2 Bay Area

Save California Solar Coalition Statement on CPUC Net Metering Proposed Decision

“​​CPUC proposed a giveaway to investor-owned utilities that would boost utility profits at the expense of energy consumers, family-supporting jobs, and California’s clean energy future.” 

 
 

Sacramento, CA— Today, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) released a proposed decision on net metering, the policy that is responsible for the growth of solar in California by making the state’s most abundant source of renewable energy affordable for consumers of all types. 

The CPUC proposal would add a $57 per month solar penalty fee for the average residential solar system. A $15 per month credit for the first 10 years would only partially offset the fee, but California would still have the highest solar penalty fees in the country. Low-income ratepayers and commercial customers would not pay the monthly fee. In addition, the commission proposed slashing export credits to approximately 5 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) on all solar users, including schools and churches. This is an 80% reduction from the 20-30 cents per kWh credited today for residential customers. Further, the commission reduced the protections for existing solar customers from the previously established 20-year grandfathering, down to 15 years. 

The Save CA Solar coalition, which includes more than 600 diverse organizations, issued the following statement on today on the CPUC proposed decision: 

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar in California and more than 120,000 public comments submitted in support of net metering, the CPUC proposed a giveaway to investor-owned utilities that would boost utility profits at the expense of energy consumers, family-supporting jobs, and California’s clean energy future. 

Solar advocates around the state are disappointed the CPUC fell for the utility profit grab by proposing the highest solar penalty fees in the nation and drastically reducing the credit solar consumers receive for selling the excess energy they produce to their neighbors. 

The fight is not over for solar advocates. Consumers, affordable housing advocates, faith leaders, environmentalists, conservationists, climate activists, and solar workers and small businesses will continue calling on the CPUC and Governor Newsom to stop the utility profit grab and keep solar growing in California.   

The CPUC will hold a final vote on the future of net metering following a 25-day public comment period on the proposed decision and alternative proposals. The proposed changes to net metering would go into effect this Spring. 

Members of the Save California Solar coalition weighed in on the CPUC proposed decision: 

“California is on a path to 100% renewable energy, and that path requires a sustained commitment to growing rooftop solar. Instead the CPUC is proposing to put a drag on our transition away from fossil fuels. State regulators calculate that to get to 100% clean energy, California needs at least 28 gigawatts (GW) of customer-sited solar by 2045; that’s nearly three times as much as we have today. The momentum that rooftop solar has now would help us reach our goal – but to gut net metering is to gut that momentum. The CPUC needs to put California’s climate change efforts first, ahead of the financial interests of the big utilities.” 

– Laura Deehan, State Director at Environment California Research & Policy Center. 

“It is a story as old as this country: a new technology is developed, programs and policies are offered to help consumers to adopt the technology and bring down the costs over time, and just when people in Black and brown communities are beginning to be able to afford the technology and benefit from it – the programs and policies are often taken away. That is exactly what the CPUC did in their proposed decision. By accepting the utility profit grab, the CPUC would take California back to a time when solar was a luxury for the wealthy and out of reach for our communities.” 

– Pastor Pastor William D. Smart, Jr., President and CEO of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Southern California

“Our diverse, grassroots coalition is disappointed in the CPUC’s proposed decision, but we are even more determined to keep up the fight to make sure California stays a solar state. In the coming weeks solar supporters will make our voices heard in creative ways online and in person so Governor Newsom understands just how unpopular the utility profit grab is among voters.” 

– Dave Rosenfeld, Director of the Solar Rights Alliance 

“This is a clean energy and jobs disaster. With this proposal, California would abandon its long-held position as a clean energy leader, threatening the jobs of tens of thousands of hard working men and women who provide clean, reliable energy for millions of consumers today. Governor Newsom needs to clean this mess up and get California back on track as a solar leader.”

– Bernadette Del Chiaro, Executive Director of California Solar & Storage Association

“This is really a debate between energy democracy vs. energy monopoly. The big utilities want to protect their control over energy delivery to protect their billions in profit. The environmental justice community wants energy equity where people are free to generate and distribute their own energy in ways that are cleaner and more affordable.” 

– Esperanza Vielma, Executive Director, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water

###

About Save California Solar

Save California Solar is a coalition founded by the Solar Rights Alliance, California's association of solar users, to help ensure that rooftop solar continues to grow and benefit every Californian. Learn more at www.savecasolar.org


Media Contact:

Jacob Hay | jhay@wearerally.com | (310) 855-2640

Solar Supporters Deliver 120,000+ Public Comments Urging Governor and CPUC to Save CA Solar from Utility “Profit Grab”

Overwhelming grassroots support grows as 600+ diverse organizations join coalition ahead of expected CPUC decision on future of solar in California

Sacramento, CA—Hundreds of solar supporters, including consumers, affordable housing advocates, faith leaders, environmentalists, conservationists, and climate activists joined together for a rally at the California State Capitol building to deliver more than 120,000 public comments to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and Governor Gavin Newsom, calling on them to save rooftop solar and stop investor-owned utility proposals to make solar unaffordable in the state.  

In addition to the public comment delivery, solar supporters also put up a 30-foot inflatable “utility profit grab man” on the Capitol steps and staged a “human billboard” message covering the Capitol lawn that says “Gov: 100,000+ Say Stop Utility Profit Grab. Save California Solar.”  

“This is where the rubber hits the road on blackouts, rising electricity bills and air pollution,” said Solar Rights Alliance Director Dave Rosenfeld, “The correct path is to help millions more working and middle class people get solar so we can keep up our progress and reject the utility profit grab that threatens to take us backwards.” 

The groundswell of public support for solar comes ahead of an expected proposed decision in the coming days by the CPUC on the future of “net metering.” Net metering is the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors and protecting them from discriminatory fees. Rooftop solar is growing fastest in working- and middle-class neighborhoods because of successful policies like net energy metering.

“The best way to ensure a cleaner and more affordable energy future for our communities is by generating our energy from solar panels on our homes, churches, small businesses, and schools,” said Green the Church Executive Director Pastor Ambrose Carroll, “We have a moral responsibility to future generations to expand rooftop solar access by preserving net metering for working families, not adding fees that only profit the big utilities.”

PG&E and other big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and maintain the need for costly and often dangerous transmission lines that are a key driver of utility profits and ratepayer costs. Proposals submitted by the utilities and other solar opponents would drastically reduce the credit solar consumers receive and add expensive monthly solar penalty fees to their energy bills. 

“This is really a debate between energy democracy vs. energy monopoly. The big utilities want to protect their control over energy delivery to protect their billions in profit,” said Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Executive Director Esperanza Vielma, “The environmental justice community wants energy equity where people are free to generate and distribute energy their own energy in ways that are cleaner and more affordable.” 

If utilities get their way, solar will become unaffordable for most consumers, costing thousands of solar jobs, making California more vulnerable to fires and blackouts, and derailing California’s clean energy progress needed to fight climate change. By making the transition to clean energy slower and more expensive, the utility profit grab would cost the state tens of billions over time and each ratepayer $295 a year

“California risks losing more than 50,000 jobs and 1,500 small businesses if the state turns the lights out on rooftop solar,” said Bernadette Del Chiaro, Executive Director of the California Solar & Storage Association. “Governor Newsom and the CPUC should not reward big utilities like PG&E while at the same time killing jobs, hurting regular consumers, and derailing California’s climate change efforts. We need to keep California a solar state.” 

“Rooftop solar needs to continue to grow quickly for California to reach its clean energy goals,” said Laura Deehan, State Director at Environment California Research & Policy Center. “Governor Newsom has the golden opportunity to help California reach its climate goals, keep the lights on and protect our state’s precious open spaces. Over 120,000 Californians agree: Governor Newsom needs to stand up to the state’s investor-owned utilities and keep rooftop solar within reach for California families and businesses.” 

To date, more than 600 diverse organizations endorsed protecting net metering and championing rooftop solar, making the Save California Solar coalition one of the largest in the state’s history of clean energy battles underscoring the inflection point in California as the state struggles to maintain its leadership against a still powerful fossil fuel lobby. 

Additional quotes from today’s rally: 

“To ensure the transition to a clean energy economy benefits our communities, we need net energy metering in combination with strong energy policies that allow decision-making and ownership of energy resources to stay in the community rather than in remote corporate boardrooms,” said People Power Solar Cooperative Co-Founder and CEO Crystal Huang, “Limitations to net energy metering will hurt our ability to create opportunities for our communities to share wealth and activate the transition to a regenerative energy economy.”

“The CADEM Renters Council calls on Governor Newsom to make rooftop solar more affordable for millions of working and middle class people, and reject proposals to make it less affordable,” said Monica Madrid of the CA Dem Renters Caucus, “No one should have to choose between paying their rent and paying their utility bills.”

“​​The Governor and the CPUC list three legs to ensuring reliability in our energy supply: rooftop solar, investor-owned utility infrastructure and energy efficiency,” said Berkeley City Councilmember Kate Harrison, “Destroying incentives for rooftop solar will topple this three-legged stool and threaten our energy future.”


###


About Save California Solar

Save California Solar is a coalition founded by the Solar Rights Alliance, California's association of solar users, to help ensure that rooftop solar continues to grow and benefit every Californian. Learn more at www.savecasolar.org


Sonoma county adopts automated permitting tool
 to lower the cost of installing solar

SANTA ROSA, CA – This week, Sonoma County became the first county in California to launch SolarAPP+, an automated application for permitting new residential rooftop solar and storage systems. SolarAPP+ will lower costs and expedite solar installations, encouraging property owners to invest in generating renewable and sustainable energy.

Lowering the cost and increasing the speed of rooftop solar installation will have a significant impact on a system’s cost.  The installation currently costs twice as much in the United States as in countries such as Australia or Germany, despite similar wages and equipment costs. The difference is caused in part due to installation costs like interest on home equity loans and other costs incurred while waiting for applications to be processed. For a solar customer, these added expenses can amount to as much as $5,000 for a typical residential solar system.

SolarAPP+ helps governments and providers cut rooftop solar permitting costs. Developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy, SolarAPP+ provides a web-based portal that streamlines and automates permit reviews. The app easily integrates into existing local government permitting software and is free for local jurisdictions.

“The launch of SolarAPP+ is not just a win for the thousands of Sonoma County residents who have thought about getting rooftop solar but have been concerned about the soft costs involved,” said Lynda Hopkins, Chair of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors. “It is also a win for our ability to meet the North Bay's climate adaptation and resiliency needs and generate thousands of good local jobs.”

The move to make solar more affordable to all communities was applauded by state leaders as an important step in the local and national fight against climate change.

“I congratulate Sonoma County for leading the way on critical resiliency initiatives like SolarAPP+ in the wake of the climate crisis we face,” said state Sen. Mark McGuire, D-Healdsburg, who chairs the Senate Government and Finance Committee. “This year I was pleased to support a climate budgetary package that included $20 million to streamline local solar and storage permitting, which will allow more Californians to make their homes climate-resilient and create thousands of good-paying jobs.”

“Rooftop solar and battery storage systems not only save money to customers but can save lives in an emergency power shutoff situation,” said state Sen. Bill Dodd, D-Napa, who serves on the Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities, and Communications and Joint Committee for Emergency Management. “With the launch of SolarAPP+, Sonoma County is poised to lead the way in solar and storage adoption, and I look forward to other North Bay jurisdictions following its lead.”

The number of SolarAPP+ adopters is projected to dramatically expand in the coming year on the heels of the California state budget, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on July 13, including $20 million for technical assistance targeted for local jurisdictions planning to adopt expedited permitting software such as SolarAPP+.

For more information please visit https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/Permit-Sonoma/