CALSSA Statement on IREC's 2022 National Solar Jobs Census

Today the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) released the 13th annual National Solar Jobs Census, a comprehensive review of the U.S. solar energy industry’s employment and workforce development. The report shows California added over 2,400 solar jobs in 2022 and remains America’s solar energy leader with a total of more than 78,000 jobs, including more than 17,500 jobs in energy storage. California’s solar jobs are more than the other top ten solar states combined and account for almost 30 percent of solar jobs across the country. Not only did California have the most solar jobs added in 2022 (2,404) it was also the leading state in clean storage jobs (17,580).

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) issued the following statement on the IREC report:

The quality and reliability of IREC’s comprehensive analysis of American solar and storage jobs nationwide and state by state is invaluable. 

California is building a clean energy future while creating high-quality jobs supporting tens of thousands of families. Last year, California solar workers built more than one power plant worth of solar energy every month (170 megawatts per month) and over two power plants worth of energy storage (250 megawatts of energy storage was added behind the meter). These projects created and supported jobs in every region of California, especially in the Central Valley. 

Not only does our industry help working families and small businesses save money on their electricity bills every month, we provide real climate change solutions by investing in behind-the-meter solar and storage technologies. 

California’s elected officials and decision makers must work to ensure the state’s clean energy progress continues with policies that support the continued growth of solar and storage.

SolarAPP+, the One-Stop Solution For Cutting Solar Red Tape Is Coming Soon to Irvine

Solar advocates share how SolarAPP+ makes it easier and cheaper for people to go solar in Irvine and across California

On Tuesday, solar advocates celebrated the City of Irvine’s progress in adopting SolarAPP+, an online permitting system developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) of the Department of Energy to make it easier and cheaper for people to go solar.

Irvine is on track to meet California’s September 30, 2023 deadline to fully transition to an automated instant permitting process for residential rooftop and storage systems mandated by the Solar Access Act (SB 379–Wiener). Irvine also applied for grant funding through the CalAPP program administered by the California Energy Commission to help cover any costs for implementing the new permitting process.

Once fully adopted, SolarAPP+ can issue same day permits for rooftop solar projects that meet state codes, a significant improvement from California’s current permit timeline average of 13 to 19 days, which delays solar installations and passes on costs to consumers. The California Solar & Storage Association estimates that the broad adoption of SolarAPP+ would lower the cost of a typical solar system for consumers by $1,200 to $2,600 across the state, and for the typical solar + storage system, consumers could see costs lowered by $2,300 to $5,100.

Making it easier for people in Irvine to go solar is an important step in the city’s ambitious Climate Action and Adaptation Plan

Local solar advocates were in attendance at Tuesday’s event, including:

  • Irvine Councilmember Dr. Kathleen Treseder, a longtime climate and renewable energy champion

  • Cailey Underhill, Advocacy & Development Director, Solar Rights Alliance

  • Caitlin McCann, Irvine resident working in the EV field

  • Brandon Dreessen, Regional Permit Manager, Sunrun

In September 2022, Governor Newsom signed the Solar Access Act into law that requires most cities and counties to automate their permitting for residential rooftop and storage systems by adopting SolarAPP+ or functionally equivalent software. 

The first compliance deadline is September 30, 2023 for jurisdictions with more than 50,000 residents. Irvine is among about 240 California cities and counties required to begin issuing instantaneous permitting for residential rooftop solar and storage projects within the next couple of months. While some jurisdictions like Irvine have begun or completed the adoption of a fully automated and instant solar and storage permitting system, many still need to initiate the process to meet the state’s deadline. Cities and counties can apply for grant funding through the CalAPP program administered by the California Energy Commission to help cover any costs for implementing the new permitting process; the deadline was extended to June 30, 2024 and is on a first-come, first-served basis for all remaining funds.

SolarAPP+ is the easiest, one-stop solution for building departments to comply with the law. It is free and available to all jurisdictions in California and across the country. The SolarAPP+ software asks the contractor a series of questions to verify the system’s design is up to code, runs automated code compliance and plan check, and then — for compliant systems — issues a permit automatically for installation to begin. More information about SolarAPP+ including a video of how it works in practice is available here.

Fast Facts:

  • On average, it takes 13 to 19 days for California building departments to issue a permit, and it is not uncommon for wait times to take 60 or more days. The result is months of delays, thousands of dollars added to solar projects that are passed along to customers, and fewer homes going solar that otherwise would.

  • It is twice as expensive to go solar in California than many other developed places because of costs associated with permitting and interconnection with utilities. SolarAPP+ has the potential to dramatically bring down the cost of solar in California by cutting red tape around permitting without sacrificing safety. SolarAPP+ permits pass inspection with rates at, or better, than traditional permitting systems. 

  • The California Solar & Storage Association estimates that the broad adoption of SolarAPP+ would lower the cost of a typical solar system for homeowners by $1,200 to $2,600 across the state, and for the typical solar + storage system by $2,300 to $5,100.

  • California cannot meet its clean energy goals and bring rooftop solar and solar batteries to more people without streamlining the local building department’s permitting process—it’s one of the biggest obstacles to solar growth.

  • According to NREL, solar projects submitted through SolarAPP+ are installed and inspected on average 12 business days faster than projects using the conventional process.

  • Streamlined permitting through SolarAPP+ also helps overstretched city and county building departments save time so they can focus on more complex projects. 

California Solar & Storage Association Releases New Consumer Best Practices for Rooftop Solar

Solar industry shares tips for consumers considering rooftop solar and storage amid net metering changes

SACRAMENTO—Amid the changes to net energy metering in California that go into effect starting on April 15, and the surge in consumers across the state adopting rooftop solar, California’s solar and storage industry is sharing tips and best practices for consumers considering going solar. 

Across the state, there are over 1.5 million solar systems installed at schools, farms, businesses, and churches, with 42% of the market being concentrated in working-class and middle-class neighborhoods. As a key driver of savings for California consumers of all types, rooftop solar and storage systems continue to be a wise investment for consumers to save on their energy bills while accessing clean, affordable, and reliable energy. 

“Going solar is one of the best ways to improve your home, save money, and protect against rising energy costs but like any major home improvement project, the best consumer is the informed consumer,” said CALSSA Executive Director Bernadette Del Chiaro. “There are advantages to going solar sooner than later, but investing in solar is going to be a wise decision for most consumers today as well as tomorrow so don’t skip important steps in the buying process.” 

CALSSA compiled a few tips for being a smart solar consumer:

  1. Get three bids from a properly licensed solar contractor, preferably one who’s a member of a trade association like CALSSA. Useful links:  https://calssa.org/member-directory or https://www.cslb.ca.gov/OnlineServices/CheckLicenseII/CheckLicense.aspx

  2. The cutoff for net metering in California’s investor owned utility territories is April 14, 2023. Consumers who live in PG&E, SCE or SDG&E territories and who submit a complete interconnection application to their utility before the cutoff date can be eligible for net metering. After that date, consumers are eligible for the new program called net billing. Net billing still affords savings for consumers who go solar but the  payback periods - the length of time it takes for your solar investment to pay for itself through monthly utility bill savings - will take more time. Consumers who live in a municipal utility territory may or may not be eligible for net metering, depending on local policies.

  3. Consider adding battery energy storage to your solar system. A battery can protect your solar investment while also giving you emergency backup power during grid outages. 

  4. Make sure you are aware of the federal "Solar Investment Tax" Credit (ITC) and how you can take advantage of it. The tax credit is worth 30% of the final cost of the solar system, which is an incentive that will be around for consumers for the next ten years. If your solar system costs $30,000, you may be eligible to deduct $9,000 off of what you owe in federal taxes. However, the ITC can only benefit you if you owe federal income taxes. 

  5. Any contract you sign should include the system size (measured in kilowatts, kW), the final installed cost, and warranty information. It should also include the license numbers of the contractor and the home improvement sales agent who sold you the solar system. The contract should be in the same language as the sales conversation. Do not sign a contract that is missing these important pieces of information.

  6. Pay as you go. Don’t make more than a $1,000 down payment upon signing a contract. There are also a lot of options for financing your solar system or signing up for a power purchase agreement that don’t require large up front investments. 

  7. If the deal seems too good to be true, it probably is. For example, no government agency will write you a check if you go solar. You can save money by going solar, but you cannot make money. Also, there is no such thing as a “zero utility bill.” Most electric bills in California contain monthly charges. These are required with or without solar. Finally, adding solar to your home does not mean you can use as much electricity as you’d like. If you significantly increase your electricity usage after going solar, outpacing the size of your solar system, your electric bill will increase. 

  8. Buyer’s remorse? California gives you three days to change your mind or five days if you’re 65 or older. Instructions on how to cancel must be included in your contract.

CALSSA representatives are available for interviews to discuss the impact of recent solar rate changes and best practices for consumers considering going solar. 

CALSSA Statement on CPUC’s Vote to Slash Solar Net Metering

“The changes to net metering approved by the CPUC are a step backwards when we really need to be moving forward with solar and battery storage. It is a dark day in California when the utility regulators try to block out the sun.” 

Sacramento, CA—The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted today to approve changes to solar net energy metering that will make rooftop solar much less affordable in California. 

Based on an initial analysis by solar advocates, changes to net metering would significantly reduce California’s solar market by slashing the value of solar energy put back on the grid by 75 percent, effective April 2023. It represents the largest cut to the value of solar in U.S. history. The result is an expected cliff in the growth of new solar installations. 

The changes also do not do enough to advance energy storage as it extends the payback periods for these combined systems beyond what they currently are. Today, California is installing roughly 30,000 batteries compared to 200,000 solar systems. With high costs, supply chain constraints, inflation and permitting and interconnection delays and challenges, it will take years before the storage market can match the solar market.   

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) issued the following statement on the CPUC’s vote to slash solar net metering. 

The CPUC vote is a loser for California on many levels. For the solar industry, it will result in business closures and the loss of green jobs. For middle class and working class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest, it puts clean energy further out of reach. For our grid reliability needs, it fails to promise robust growth in battery storage. And for California's race to clean energy, it puts us behind our goals and out of step with the national pro-solar agenda. 

Solar advocates are proud we were able to fight back against the most egregious attacks on rooftop solar the CPUC included in earlier proposed changes to net metering. We stopped a discriminatory solar tax and protected current solar users from a broken deal. 

Still, the changes to net metering approved by the CPUC are a step backwards when we really need to be moving forward with solar and battery storage. It is a dark day in California when the utility regulators try to block out the sun. The solar movement will continue looking for ways to keep rooftop solar growing and affordable in California despite this setback. 

Background:

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches, farms, and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during recent heat waves. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

A proposed decision released in December 2021, that would have implemented an unprecedented solar tax and drastic net metering credit reductions, was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. Despite that backlash and the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar in California, the CPUC’s revised proposed decision still included an immediate and drastic slash to the value of net metering.   

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the California leaders to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers. More than 160,000 people submitted comments to the CPUC and Governor Newsom calling for a strong NEM-3 decision, the highest count in CPUC history.

CALSSA Statement on CPUC’s Final Proposed Decision on Solar Net Metering

“The CPUC's final proposal is a loser for California on many levels. The proposal is a step backwards when we really need to be moving forward with solar and battery storage. It is a dark day in California when the utility regulators try to block out the sun.”

Sacramento, CA—The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) released a final proposed decision today on solar net energy metering, which the CPUC commissioners are expected to vote on December 15.  

Based on an initial analysis by solar advocates, the final proposed decision would significantly reduce California’s solar market. The final proposed decision maintains a 75 percent decline in the value of solar energy, effective April 2023. 

The final proposed decision also does not do enough to advance energy storage as it elongates the payback periods for these combined systems beyond what they are today. Today, California is installing roughly 30,000 batteries compared to 200,000 solar systems. With high costs, supply chain constraints, inflation and permitting and interconnection delays and challenges, it will take years before the storage market can match the solar market.   

While the revisions to the proposal preserve the current value of solar energy for multi-family housing and farms until further analysis can be done, those minor modifications alone will not protect California’s overall solar market. 

Overall, the final proposal fails to provide a sensible glidepath on lowering solar export rates while maintaining the growth of energy storage for both the residential and commercial markets. The result is an expected cliff in the growth of new solar installations and the expansion of battery storage capacity, according to solar advocates and industry experts. 

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) issued the following statement on the CPUC’s proposed decision: 

The CPUC's final proposal is a loser for California on many levels. For the solar industry, it will result in business closures and the loss of green jobs. For middle class and working class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest, it puts clean energy further out of reach. For our grid reliability needs, it fails to promise robust growth in battery storage. And for California's race to clean energy, it puts us behind our goals and out of step with the national pro-solar agenda. The proposal is a step backwards when we really need to be moving forward with solar and battery storage. It is a dark day in California when the utility regulators try to block out the sun.

Background:

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches, farms, and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during recent heat waves. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

A proposed decision released in December 2021, that would have implemented an unprecedented solar tax and drastic net metering credit reductions, was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. Despite that backlash and the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar in California, the CPUC’s current proposed decision still includes an immediate and drastic slash to the value of net metering.   

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the California leaders to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers. More than 160,000 people submitted comments to the CPUC and Governor Newsom calling for a strong NEM-3 decision, the highest count in CPUC history.

Agricultural Groups Urge CPUC and Governor Newsom to Keep Solar Affordable for Farms and Agricultural Businesses

110 farmers and agricultural business leaders call on Governor Newsom and CPUC to support the Net Energy Metering Aggregation (NEMA) program as utilities push to end it.

SACRAMENTO—A group of 110 California farmers and agricultural businesses signed an open letter to Governor Newsom and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), calling on them to support Net Energy Metering Aggregation (NEMA). NEMA helps farms stabilize electricity costs and save money by accessing affordable, reliable, and renewable power when they need it most.

The CPUC is considering changes to Net Energy Metering (NEM), the state policy that makes solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the energy they share back to the grid. The CPUC’s current proposed decision on net metering would make it less affordable for residential and commercial consumers to install solar by reducing the value of energy exported to the grid.

Farms and agriculture businesses are not spared the impact of export rate cuts, but the current proposed decision would maintain a key NEM program that more and more farmers have come to depend on, NEMA, which “requires the utilities to net out a farm’s electricity usage from the amount of exported power,” according to the farm letter. 

However, the letter goes on to note that “utilities are continuing to press for changes that would bill farmers as if they are not using any of the power they are generating.” That change “would render NEMA useless altogether.” 

The letter urges Governor Newsom and the CPUC not to “destroy one of the leading ways we can invest in ourselves to hedge against the eternally rising costs of running a farm.” 

A vote on the CPUC proposed decision is expected on December 15. 

Consumers, Climate Activists and Green Workers Rally Across California to Keep Rooftop Solar Growing and Affordable

Day of action across the State to save solar

California—Coalitions of energy consumers, climate activists and green workers held rallies across California today, calling on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and Governor Newsom to keep rooftop solar growing and affordable. 

The CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. A proposed decision released by the CPUC in November would immediately slash net energy metering credits by 75 percent, down to between $0.05 and $0.08 per kilowatt. 

The proposed changes would make solar unaffordable for most consumers, eliminate green jobs in the solar industry, and slow California’s progress towards 100 percent clean energy. A vote on the proposed decision by the CPUC is expected on December 15. 

At churches, restaurants, historic plazas, utility offices and the CPUC headquarters, solar advocates held ten simultaneous events in San Diego. Los Angeles, Palm Springs, Bakersfield, Fresno, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, San Francisco, Stockton, and Chico. 

Quotes:

“Sending rooftop solar off a cliff and making it too expensive for everyday people fulfills the utilities' dream," said Solar Rights Alliance director Dave Rosenfeld. “It will also harm everyday Californians looking for a break from ever rising energy bills, blackouts and air pollution. This is Governor Newsom's moment to show the public where he stands. Will he keep rooftop solar growing, or let it wither at the hands of the monopoly?” 

"Rooftop solar has seen its greatest growth in Latino communities. These immigrant communities struggle monthly to pay their energy bill, especially those in the Central Valley and desert communities where summer temperatures are often over 100 degrees. Rooftop solar is a liberating technology for those families. Now PUC bureaucrats want to roll back solar incentives for our families. That’s unjust,” said Francisco Moreno, Executive Director of The Council of Mexican Federations in North America (COFEM).

“The CPUC’s proposal throws a wrench into a successful incentive program that has helped California become number one in the nation for solar production,” said Steven King with Environment California. “By discouraging everyday Californians from going solar, we put our climate, public health and energy resilience at risk. To build a clean energy future, rooftop solar is an important tool we need to keep in our toolbox.” 

“Affordable energy is critical to local families. However, when we outreach into environmental justice communities, the first economic complaint of most families is the incredible portion of their income they spend on electricity and water,” said Esperanza Vielma of the Environmental Justice Coalition for Water.

“In our communities many families go without basic necessities in the hot summer months because they need to pay large electrical bills or the IOUs cut that power. Unfortunately, the CPUC's proposal will make access to cheaper rooftop solar for our communities more expensive and out of our reach. That's going backward,” said Destiny Rivas of the San Joaquin Urban Native Council. 

“Our business is in the process of adding solar panels and backup storage because it makes economic sense. With lower monthly electric bills, we can keep our restaurant prices affordable and serve our community,” said Alicia Cardenas, the owner of Nena's on B Street, a popular Mexican restaurant in Stockton. 

Background:

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches, farms, and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during recent heat waves. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

A proposed decision released in December 2022, that would have implemented an unprecedented solar tax and drastic net metering credit reductions, was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. Despite that backlash and the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar in California, the CPUC’s current proposed decision still includes an immediate and drastic slash to the value of net metering.   

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the California leaders to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers. More than 160,000 people submitted comments to the CPUC and Governor Newsom calling for a strong NEM-3 decision, the highest count in CPUC history.

CALSSA Statement on CPUC’s Revised Proposed Decision on Solar Net Metering

Sacramento, CA—The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) released a revised proposed decision today on solar net energy metering. Though the proposal avoids unfair and illegal solar taxes and fees, it would make solar less affordable by reducing the credit consumers receive for contributing their excess solar energy back to the power grid, known as export rates. 

The solar industry and clean energy supporters are still reviewing the CPUC’s proposed decision, but based on an initial analysis it would cut the average export rate in California from $0.30 per kilowatt to $0.08 per kilowatt and make those cuts effective in April 2023, resulting in a 75 percent reduction in value of exports.   

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) issued the following statement on the CPUC’s proposed decision: 

The CPUC’s new proposed decision would really hurt. It needs more work or it will replace the solar tax with a steep solar decline. An immediate 75 percent reduction of net energy metering credits does not support a growing solar market in California. 

If passed as is, the CPUC’s proposal would protect utility monopolies and boost their profits, while making solar less affordable and delaying the goal of 100 percent clean energy. 

California needs more solar power and more solar-charged batteries, not less. 

We urge Governor Newsom and the CPUC to make further adjustments to help more middle- and working-class consumers as well as schools and farms access affordable, reliable, clean energy. 

Background:

The CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during recent heat waves. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC’s proposed decision released last December would have implemented a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy. 

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom.

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the CPUC to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers. More than 160,000 people submitted comments to the CPUC and Governor Newsom calling for a strong NEM-3 decision, the highest count in CPUC history.

###

About CALSSA

The California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) has advanced the common interest of the solar and storage industry for over 40 years, making California the most robust market in the U.S. The association is the state’s largest clean energy business group with over 700 member companies representing an array of businesses that manufacture, design, install, finance and provide other resources to the growing local solar and storage market in California. Learn more at www.calssa.org.

Solar Supporters Urge CA Public Utilities Commission to Keep Rooftop Solar Growing and Affordable at Meeting in Chico

CHICO—Over 50 local solar supporters turned out to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) meeting in Chico on Thursday, urging commissioners to keep rooftop solar growing and affordable. 

Solar is currently growing fastest in working and middle class neighborhoods and helping to advance California’s race to clean energy. That progress is threatened by utility-backed efforts in the California Public Utilities Commission to reduce competition by making solar unaffordable for most consumers through changes to a popular state policy called “net energy metering.” Net energy metering makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Here are some highlighted news clips from the November 3 hearing:

You can view the entire database of news clips from the hearing here.
………

CPUC Net Energy Metering Proceeding Background:

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is considering changes to net energy metering, the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during the recent heat wave. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC’s proposed decision released last December would have implemented a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy. 

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. A new proposal from the CPUC could come as soon as mid-November. 

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the CPUC to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers.

Coalition Celebrates Diverse Support for Rooftop Solar Energy and Urges Governor Newsom to Keep Solar Growing for Everyone in California

SACRAMENTO—Over a thousand solar supporters, representing a diverse coalition from all over California, gathered at the state capitol for an “Everyone Under the Sun Festival and Rally” to celebrate California’s clean energy progress and urge Governor Newsom to keep solar growing for California energy consumers in all communities.

Photo by Ricky Mackie. View all event photos here.

The event featured performances by James Jackson & All Stars Gospel Choir, Mariachi Nuevo Mexico de Sacramento, Keen Khmer Ballet, Aztec Dancers, and the Grammy-Award winning band Ozomatli, along with remarks from notable climate advocacy and social justice leaders. During the event, participants created a 480-foot long painted billboard on 10th street with a pro-solar message for Governor Newsom, and displayed a giant 40x70 foot flag with a “keep solar growing for all” message on the lawn in front of the state capitol building. 

Photo by Jason Vetterli. View all event photos here.

Solar is currently growing fastest in working and middle class neighborhoods and helping to advance California’s race to clean energy. That progress is threatened by utility-backed efforts in the California Public Utilities Commission to reduce competition by making solar unaffordable for most consumers through changes to a popular state policy called “net energy metering.” Net energy metering makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Event Quotes: 

“It's no accident that California is the nation’s solar leader, with now a million and a half solar rooftops; it's the direct result of state action to promote and grow clean energy; and this is no time to abandon the mantle of leadership,” said Laura Deehan, Environment California State Director. “We need four times as much rooftop solar if we want to protect our climate and our environment; let’s not get rid of solar incentives that help us reach that goal. Let’s reject solar taxes and go much further in supporting adoption of this critical clean energy technology.”

“State leaders are kidding themselves if they think we can meet our clean energy goals entirely with remote solar farms and new power lines, especially as we add millions of electric vehicles in communities throughout the state,” said Brad Heavner, policy director of the California Solar & Storage Association. “We need local power, and a new tax on solar would be the wrong direction for California.”

“To achieve true energy equity, we need to allow people to come together to share resources to create better solutions for everyone,” said Crystal Huang, Co-Founder  of the People Power Solar Cooperative. “We need strong energy policies that allow decision-making and ownership of energy resources to stay in the community rather than in remote corporate boardrooms. For the safety, health, and well-being of our communities, it's time to move toward a decentralized energy model that advances community-centered policy and expands access to distributed energy resources, like rooftop solar and community-owned solar, storage, and microgrids. This transition must prioritize  community-owned and public renewable energy projects developed by cooperatives, municipalities, and nonprofits that build shared wealth and decision-making power for BIPOC and low-income communities who are disproportionately harmed by the extractive energy economy.” 

“Fifteen years ago, you had to be very wealthy to access solar. Today, one and a half million Californians have access to solar on their rooftops. Those Californians are out on the streets with us today, urging Gov. Newsom to keep solar growing for everyone under the sun,” said Dave Rosenfeld, Executive Director, Solar Rights Alliance. “We represent the voices of consumers, farmers, tenants, solar workers, small business owners, and climate advocates, calling on California to expand access to clean energy for all its residents and communities. Our coalition isn’t powered by investor-owned interests, greed, or preserving the status quo—it’s powered by people.”

CPUC Net Energy Metering Proceeding Background:

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is considering changes to net energy metering, the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

In total, distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during the recent heat wave. 

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and protect their profits. Utilities claim solar makes the energy bills of non-solar customers more expensive. But in reality, utility profits, infrastructure investment, transmission lines, and paying for their bad planning and the fires they cause are what drives energy rates up. Californians are not fooled, and real equity champions know energy fairness is about “making rooftop solar panels and batteries more—not less—affordable for working families and lower-income Californians.”

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC’s proposed decision released last December would have implemented a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy. 

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom.

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the CPUC to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers.

Video Clips from Everyone Under the Sun Rally & Festival

About Save California Solar
Save California Solar is a coalition formed to help ensure that rooftop solar continues to grow and benefit every Californian. Save CA Solar includes more than 600 diverse organizations and helped generate 150,000+ public comments submitted in support of net metering ahead of the CPUC proposed decision. Learn more at www.savecaliforniasolar.org

CALSSA Statement on Governor Newsom’s Climate Change Legislation

“Meeting the goal of 90 percent clean energy is impossible without a lot more rooftop solar.” 

Sacramento, CA—Today Governor Newsom signed a package of legislation aimed at addressing climate change, including advancing California’s clean energy goal to 90% clean electricity by 2035. Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) issued the following statement:

We enthusiastically applaud Governor Newsom for his leadership in fighting climate change and for setting goals that move California toward a clean energy future. 

By all measures, meeting the goal of 90 percent clean energy by 2035 is absolutely impossible without a lot more rooftop solar installed at homes, apartments, businesses, churches and schools around the state. That is why we also commend Governor Newsom for his opposition earlier this year to a proposal from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) that would have slammed the brakes on California’s solar progress by taxing it and making it unaffordable for most consumers. 

With new commissioners and leadership in place at the CPUC, we are hopeful for a proposal that follows Governor Newsom’s lead and keeps rooftop solar and storage accelerating in order to advance, not hinder, California’s race to clean energy in the fight against climate change. 

CPUC Net Energy Metering Proceeding Background:

The CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by crediting them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. Together, these distributed solar energy systems have added 13 gigawatts of solar energy to the state, roughly the size of six Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. In addition, consumers have added nearly 1 gigawatt of energy storage which played a meaningful role in keeping the lights on during last week’s heat wave. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and maintain the need for costly and often dangerous transmission lines that are a key driver of utility profits and ratepayer costs. 

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC’s proposed decision released late last year would have implemented a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy.  

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved for an indefinite amount of time earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. The CPUC then issued a ruling to re-open its net energy metering proceeding. Based on the 90 day window that began with the July 1, 2022 deadline for intervenor comments on the CPUC’s proceeding, a new proposed decision is expected to be released on or before September 29, 2022. 

With rooftop solar’s vital contribution to reaching California’s clean energy goals, the promise of battery storage for grid reliability, and new federal incentives for going solar, a diverse coalition of solar supporters are calling on the CPUC to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers

Distributed Sun-Charged Batteries Helped Grid During California Heat Wave, Again

This week’s record-breaking heat wave stressed California’s electric grid but, once again, distributed customer-sited batteries, charged up by solar panels, helped keep the lights on.

An analysis by the California Solar and Storage Association (CALSSA) shows that California had more than 80,000 customer-sited batteries connected to the electric grid capable of providing 900 MW of solar power.

While not all the batteries were set to discharge during the peak hours of 4pm-9pm on September 6, an estimated 76% were, which as a fleet, were capable of providing up to 684 MW of power at any given moment. We estimate that 50% of these batteries’ aggregate power was put into use during peak hours, providing approximately 340 MW of power. To put this into perspective, a mid-sized natural gas power plant is 250 MW.

When California suffered rolling blackouts in August 2020, California had 30,000 distributed batteries with the potential to discharge 500 MW of power. In just two years, 50,000 consumers added 400 MW of clean sun-charged battery power. The current 900 MW of distributed batteries in California is nearly the size of Diablo Canyon’s Unit 1.

“The biggest battery in the world is located in garages around California and they are helping keep the lights on for everyone,” said Bernadette Del Chiaro, CALSSA executive director. “While it goes largely unrecognized by utilities and grid operators, these consumer investments in clean energy played a crucial role during this week’s heat wave helping keep the lights on not just for the homeowners and businesses who made the investment but for everyone.”

Consumer batteries charged by on-site solar panels can be pre-programmed to discharge at set times and on set days. The most common setting is for the battery to charge up in the morning, as soon as the solar panels start to generate electricity, and then discharge starting at 4pm, 5pm or 6pm depending on local utility rates and consumer settings. Once discharging, the batteries cover on-site load, helping relieve strain on the grid, or in the case of a net metered battery, can export power to a neighbor. 

“Solar and storage homes and businesses are like Flex Alert superheroes. They not only reduce strain on the grid, they can go a step further and share surplus electrons with their neighbors,” said Del Chiaro.

CALSSA estimates that California utilities, purchasing electricity on the spot market on Tuesday, spent an extra $450 million compared to a “normal” hot day the previous week. $450 million spent on consumer batteries instead would be an investment in a resource that lasts 10-15 years, as opposed to one day.

Programs that operate distributed behind-the-meter batteries like a virtual power plant, dispatching an aggregated fleet of small batteries on command, pinpointed to the exact time and location where the grid needs the electricity most, have also been proven effective. Several companies have fleets of these batteries located on customer properties and enrolled in programs such as the Emergency Load Reduction Program (ELRP). Tesla, for example, had 4,500 consumer batteries that, in the aggregate, discharged 32 MW during peak hours on September 6, 2022.

Pilot programs like these are proof that customer-sited batteries can be relied upon during grid emergencies, a concern utilities and grid-operators often cite as a reason to not support policies to deploy more of them.

“As our electricity needs grow, California should encourage consumers to build sun-charged batteries everywhere,” said Del Chiaro. “The instinct of the utility is to keep everything under their control and limited it to what they need today instead of planning ahead and riding the wave of the future.”

CALSSA is calling on policy makers and regulators to recognize the enormous value and potential of distributed customer-sited sun-charged batteries and amplify various policy tools to accelerate their adoption. First and foremost, CALSSA continues its call on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to not tax solar panels and the batteries they charge via the so-called “NEM-3” decision and to ensure a smooth transition to an all solar battery future.

“We have built 1.5 million solar roofs to date,” said Del Chiaro. “Our next horizon is to build 1.5 million sun-charged batteries. We can get there with policies that work with consumers, not against them. Distributed solar and storage may not fit neatly into the investor-owned utility business model but, frankly, rolling blackouts, or even just the threat of them, don’t fit the California economy.”  

“Don’t Tax the Sun” Tour Crossing California: Solar Supporters Protest to Stop Solar Tax Proposal that Boosts Utility Profits at the Expense of Clean Energy Needs 

CALIFORNIA—Solar workers, consumers, clean energy advocates, community leaders, conservationists, and climate activists are rallying at investor-owned utilities across the state over the next two weeks to protest a utility-backed proposal to tax rooftop solar and drastically reduce the credits consumers receive for selling their solar energy back to the grid. 

 

Save California Solar Coalition partners and protesters, along with tv news crews gather in front of the headquarters of Sempra in San Diego, the parent company of San Diego Gas & Electric on Tuesday, July 19.

 

The tour goes from July 19 to July 29 and includes stops at utility offices in San Diego, the Coachella Valley, Bakersfield, San Luis Obispo, Fresno, Santa Cruz and Chico.During the events solar advocates will deliver “cease and desist” letters to California’s investor owned utilities, calling on them to stop trying to make solar unaffordable and halt California’s clean energy progress. 

 

Save California Solar Coalition partners and protesters, along with tv news crews gather in front of PG&E in Bakersfield on Thursday, July 21.

 

The CPUC is currently considering utility-proposed changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and maintain the need for costly and often dangerous transmission lines that are a key driver of utility profits and ratepayer costs. 

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC is considering a proposed decision, favored by investor-owned utilities, to implement a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy.  

The CPUC proposed drastic changes that favored the utilities last December and are expected to issue a revised decision sometime next month.

By contrast, solar supporters want to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers, ensure California remains on track with its clean energy and land conservation goals, and accelerate the growth of solar plus storage to build a more resilient electric grid.

“Don’t Tax the Sun” rally on July 26 in San Luis Obispo. The group marched to PG&E’s office on Higuera Street. Credit: Paso Robles Daily News

Solar Supporters Rally in LA and San Francisco to Stop CPUC’s Latest Solar Tax Proposal that Boosts Utility Profits at the Expense of Clean Energy Needs

“Don’t Tax the Sun” events are part of the largest ever submission of live and video-recorded public comments in CPUC history

Nearly 1000 solar supporters gathered on the steps of the CPUC on Thursday to give public testimony.

CALIFORNIA—Thousands of solar workers, consumers, clean energy advocates, community leaders, conservationists, and climate activists rallied on Thursday to protest the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) latest proposal to tax rooftop solar and drastically reduce the credits consumers receive for selling their solar energy back to the grid. Solar supporters held simultaneous actions in Los Angeles and at the CPUC headquarters in San Francisco. 

Hundreds more gathered in LA to give public testimony live on stage and via video which will be submitted to the CPUC public record.

In San Francisco hundreds of solar supporters lined-up at the CPUC headquarters to deliver public comments. In Los Angeles, solar supporters gave “public comments” on stage to a mock dais of CPUC commissioners, while hundreds of attendees recorded their own video testimonials to submit to the CPUC. Combined, Thursday’s actions are the largest ever submission of live and video-recorded public comments in CPUC history.

The CPUC is currently considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.5 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.

Big utilities want to change the rules in their favor in order to eliminate a growing competitor, keep consumers stuck in utility monopolies, and maintain the need for costly and often dangerous transmission lines that are a key driver of utility profits and ratepayer costs. 

Despite the overwhelming popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, the CPUC is considering a proposed decision, favored by investor-owned utilities, to implement a monthly solar penalty tax while also slashing credits consumers receive for their excess solar energy.  

The CPUC had previously proposed a similar steep tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits of solar consumers. The unpopular proposed decision was shelved for an indefinite amount of time earlier this year after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. The CPUC’s recent ruling to re-open its net energy metering procedures seems again to be pursuing a tax, this time hidden and under a different name.

By contrast, solar supporters want to keep solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers, ensure California remains on track with its clean energy and land conservation goals, and accelerate the growth of solar plus storage to build a more resilient electric grid.

CALSSA Statement on CPUC Reopening NEM 3 and Pushing Back a Decision Until at least July

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) announced today it is “reopening the record” on its net energy metering “NEM 3” proceeding, in order to gather information on some specific elements of the decision. The record reopening delays a proposed decision from the CPUC on NEM 3 until July at the earliest. 

For over a year the CPUC has considered changes to net energy metering backed by utility interests. The CPUC’s initial proposed decision, which included a steep tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits solar consumers receive, would have made solar unaffordable for most consumers, especially those in working and middle class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest. It would also hurt the commercial, government and agricultural solar markets. The unpopular proposed decision was shelved for an indefinite amount of time after intense backlash and public disapproval from Governor Newsom. 

Now, as the CPUC reopens the process for considering policy changes to rooftop solar, the stakes are coming into heightened focus. California is expecting summer power shortages and blackouts due to both limited supplies of energy and growing demand for electricity, to the extent that Governor Newsom may reverse plans to shut down the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. As a superior, no-regrets solution, solar advocates are calling for a new proposed decision that keeps solar growing and affordable for all types of consumers, ensures California remains on track with its clean energy and land conservation goals, and accelerates the growth of solar plus storage to build a more resilient electric grid. Solar supporters note California built the equivalent capacity of two Diablo Canyon-sized power plants through rooftop solar between 2017 and 2021 and can repeat that progress by 2024, unless regulators make changes that undermine the rooftop solar market. 

The distributed storage market is also significant with more than 800 MW of storage installed to date and more than 1 gigawatt of additional energy storage expected by 2024. Together, this is nearly the equivalent storage capacity of both Diablo Canyon reactors. 

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association issued the following statement on today’s ruling from the CPUC administrative law judge on the NEM 3 record reopening: 

“Our large and diverse coalition of solar supporters is glad the CPUC recognized just how far out of step the first proposed decision was with California’s clean energy goals and equity values. Californians strongly support rooftop solar and will not accept a decision that taxes the sun or slows our state’s clean energy progress by making solar unaffordable.  

At the same time, we know utility special interests have a lot of power and a significant profit motive in stopping competition from rooftop solar. And, to be clear, a solar tax appears to still be on the table. We will continue to make sure no one is fooled again by the utility profit grab that makes electricity more expensive for everyone and halts California’s grid resilience and clean energy progress.” 

###

Florida Governor DeSantis Vetoes Bill to Make Rooftop Solar Unaffordable

Sacramento, CA—On Wednesday, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis vetoed legislation, backed by investor-owned utilities in the state, to change “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. 

In his veto message, Governor DeSantis said the legislation, which aimed to “recover lost [utility] revenues resulting from residential solar generation” and also increases costs on all energy consumers, would contribute to the inflationary  “financial crunch” Floridians are experiencing.  

For the past year California’s Public Utility Commission CPUC has considered similar changes to net energy metering also backed by utility interests. The CPUC’s initial proposed decision, which included a $700 annual tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits solar consumers receive, would have made solar unaffordable for most consumers, especially those in working and middle class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest. The unpopular proposed decision was shelved for an indefinite amount of time after intense backlash. 

Now, as the CPUC reconsiders rooftop solar changes, solar advocates are calling for a new proposed decision that keeps solar affordable for all types of consumers, ensures California remains on track with its clean energy and land conservation goals, and promotes the growth of solar and storage to build a more resilient electric grid. 

Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association issued the following statement on Governor DeSantis’ veto: 

Governor DeSantis did not fall for the utilities’ playbook of protecting their profits and monopolies by eliminating competition from rooftop solar. Governor Newsom’s administration should not fall for it either. When it comes to keeping solar affordable, growing, and contributing to our clean energy future, California should be not only keeping pace with Florida, but leading the world.  

###

Solar Supporters Stage “Phone-In” Outside CPUC

As Net-Energy Metering 3.0 proceedings enter second year of deliberation, solar consumers, workers, and environmentalists are calling for answers and transparency 

SAN FRANCISCO—Solar supporters staged a live “phone-in” on the steps of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) headquarters, during Thursday’s virtual meeting, seeking answers about a rooftop solar proceeding that has largely occurred out of public view.

Over the past year, the CPUC has considered changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. The CPUC’s initial proposed decision, which included a $700 annual tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits solar consumers receive, would have made solar unaffordable for most consumers, especially those in working and middle class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest. 

The unpopular proposed decision was shelved after intense backlash from environmentalists, conservationists, affordable housing advocates, civil rights leaders, justice advocates, along with solar consumers, workers and small businesses who rejected it as a total giveaway to investor-owned utilities that would have boosted utility profits at the expense of all consumers, tens of thousands of jobs, and California’s clean energy future.

“For a year now, a diverse coalition of organizations, leaders, consumers, and workers have spoken up for solar, to make sure California stays a solar state,” said Dave Rosenfeld, Director of the Solar Rights Alliance. “As these proceedings enter their second year, we want the CPUC and Governor Newsom to understand just how unpopular the idea of putting utility profits over people is in California.”

Now, as the CPUC reconsiders rooftop solar changes, solar advocates are seeking transparency in the process and answers. During Thursday’s “phone-in,” hundreds of solar supporters around the state waited on-hold to make public comments during the CPUC’s virtual meeting. Outside CPUC headquarters, dozens of activists also called into the meeting while holding signs with questions for the CPUC like  “what about real energy equity”, “what about climate leadership”, and “what about getting to 100% renewable”.    

“Let’s be clear: this is a debate about energy democracy vs. energy monopoly,” said Esperanza Vielma, Executive Director, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water. “Big utilities want to protect their control over energy delivery to protect their billions in profit. The environmental justice community wants energy equity where people are free to generate and distribute their own energy in ways that are cleaner and more affordable. It’s really not that hard for the CPUC to be on the right side of history.”

The CPUC phone-in action follows large scale rallies and marches with thousands of solar workers and solar advocates protesting against the proposed decision at CPUC offices in Los Angeles and San Francisco. Previously, solar advocates formed a human billboard at the State Capitol in Sacramento and wrote a “Solar, Not Oil” message to Governor Newson in the sand on Huntington Beach.

“Our power doesn’t come from money and political influence, it comes from our diverse coalition representing the needs and desires of environmentalists, conservationists, farmers, students, disabled communities, renters, churches, schools, labor, and small businesses across the state,” said Jessica Tovar, Energy Democracy Organizer with the Local Clean Energy Alliance. “Our grassroots coalition represents California voters from all walks of life, who overwhelmingly support the growth of local solar and oppose the push by investor-owned utilities to increase their profits by making solar more expensive for everyone.”

Recent polling shows the continued popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, along with the extreme unpopularity of CPUC’s proposed decision. Support for protecting rooftop solar is also reflected in endorsements by the Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Sacramento Bee, Santa Cruz Sentinel, and San Luis Obispo Tribune editorial boards. 

“To ensure the transition to a clean energy economy truly benefits our communities, we need net energy metering in combination with strong energy policies that allow decision-making and ownership of energy resources to stay in the community rather than in remote corporate boardrooms,” said People Power Solar Cooperative Co-Founder and CEO Crystal Huang, “Limiting net energy metering will hurt our ability to create opportunities for our communities to share wealth and activate the transition to a regenerative energy economy.”

The Save CA Solar coalition will continue calling on the CPUC to find a better way to support solar in California, including encouraging Governor Newsom to step in with a solution that keeps solar affordable, saves solar jobs and keeps California on the path to 100% clean energy.

Twenty-Two California Legislators Call on CPUC to Keep Rooftop Solar Growing and Affordable

“We are confident that a reconsidered, modernized NEM proposal will strike the balance of expanding access to rooftop solar and energy storage.”

CALIFORNIA—A group of twenty California State Legislators—comprising both Senators and Assemblymembers from both political parties—urged the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to keep solar growing, affordable, and in line with California’s clean energy goals, in a letter issued to Alice Reynolds, Chair of the CPUC this week. 

Referencing the CPUC’s “proposed decision on current net energy metering (NEM),” the state legislators lauded the CPUC’s “desire to adhere to the ‘guiding principles’ of sustainable growth amongst all ratepayers”, as well as “expanded clean energy access to low-income and environmental justice communities”, but expressed deep concerns over specific elements of the proposed decision.

In the letter, California legislators noted that a monthly solar fee could “significantly depress the clean energy market, negatively impact California-based businesses and jobs, and impact the availability of much needed affordable housing.” They added that this fee, along with a 70-80% cut in solar energy credits would effectively penalize families, educational, non-profit, and agricultural institutions investing in energy and storage to help California meet its clean energy future. 

“We are confident that a reconsidered, modernized NEM proposal will strike the balance of expanding access to rooftop solar and energy storage, while maintaining the structure needed to continue to build a more resilient, equitable, and clean electric grid,” the letter concluded. 

State Senator Nancy Skinner and Assemblymember Cristina Garcia also sent individual letters to the CPUC earlier this year urging the commission to protect rooftop solar in California, expressing concerns over creating economic and environmental setbacks for California’s consumers and exacerbating inequities in access to clean energy. 

The letter from California state legislators follows a recent congressional letter to the CPUC from twenty-six California members of congress in support of rooftop solar that said, “imposing a tax on solar panels and reducing the rate of solar power exports by as much as 80 percent would label California as a climate straggler, not a climate leader.” They also expressed concern that the proposed decision runs counter to federal renewable energy policies and “would reportedly cut California’s rooftop solar market in half by 2024.” 

The CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar and storage more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.3 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today. 

Recent polling shows the continued popularity of rooftop solar and net metering in California, along with the extreme unpopularity of CPUC’s proposed decision. Support for protecting rooftop solar is also reflected in endorsements by the Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Sacramento Bee, Santa Cruz Sentinel, and San Luis Obispo Tribune editorial boards.

The CPUC delayed consideration of its proposed decision indefinitely following intense backlash from solar consumers, solar workers, small businesses, faith leaders, affordable housing advocates, environmentalists and conservation groups. 

The twenty State Legislators from California who signed on to the letter to CPUC Chair Alice Reynolds, dated March 14th, include:

  • Senator Josh Becker

  • Senator John Laird

  • Assemblymember Phil Ting

  • Assemblymember Jordan Cunningham

  • Assemblymember James Gallagher

  • Assemblymember Marc Berman

  • Assemblymember Dr. Akilah Weber

  • Assemblymember Marc Levine

  • Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin 

  • Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel

  • Senator Scott Weiner

  • Senator Mike Mcguire

  • Assemblymember Jim Wood

  • Assemblymember Phillip Chen

  • Assemblymember Al Muratsutchi

  • Assemblymember Christopher Ward

  • Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian

  • Assemblymember Buffy Wicks

  • Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan

  • Assemblymember Evan Low

CALSSA Statement on California Energy Commission’s Announcement on California’s Clean Energy Progress

Sacramento, CA—Today, the California Energy Commission (CEC) announced progress in meeting the state’s 100% clean energy goals ahead of schedule. California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) executive director Bernadette Del Chiaro issued the following statement in response:

California should be proud of its clean energy leadership, and we have the California Energy Commission to thank for much of that progress. However, with less than 35% of our electricity coming from renewable resources today, it is premature to celebrate, and especially so as utilities continue their attack on California’s renewable energy bright spot: rooftop solar.

California policy makers should be sounding the alarm and calling for all-hands-on-deck action to double our renewable energy resources by 2025, and doubling them again by 2030, as called for by the Biden Administration last year.

It took California 20 years to generate 35% of its electricity from renewable resources like solar and wind power. State law dictates we at least double that, hitting 60% renewables in less than 10 years, by 2030. And, climate science dictates the goalposts of getting to 100% carbon-free energy should be moved way up from the current 2045 timeframe.

Complicating matters, demand for electricity is expected to increase significantly as more consumers switch to electric cars and appliances making those higher benchmarks even harder to hit. Further, the state’s last remaining nuclear power plant is scheduled to close in 2024 and the prolonged drought is severely limiting hydro power.  

All of these dynamics mean California needs to pick up the pace on renewable energy development more than ever before.

Meanwhile, rooftop solar, which continues to grow especially among middle- and working-class communities and added more than a nuclear-power plant worth of renewable energy last year, is under attack. Investor-owned utilities, led by PG&E, view rooftop solar as a competitive threat to their monopoly business model. They have launched a well-funded attack campaign to blame rooftop solar users for rising energy costs when research shows building distributed generation like rooftop solar and batteries is key to both controlling costs and creating greater grid reliability.

A California study put out by the California Public Utilities Commission last year showed utility profit and uncontrolled utility spending is squarely to blame for rising costs. When California voters are asked what they believe is causing rate increases, rooftop solar is listed last, by just 11%, well behind utility companies seeking to maintain of boost their profits (51%), managing wildfire danger (41%), grid maintenance (33%), and the cost of building new electric transmission lines (15%).

Data presented in today’s announcement by the Commission shows utility-scale renewable energy has not grown significantly for several years. The document cites the data as “Renewable Portfolio Standard-eligible resources” which typically does not include rooftop solar, or distributed generation, built and maintained by consumers.

 
 

Rooftop solar, by contrast, is California’s renewable energy bright spot, adding over 1.5 GWs of energy in 2021 alone as the data from the state-run website “DG Stats” shows.  

 

As the California Public Utilities Commission continues to deliberate the so-called “NEM-3” proceeding, CALSSA joins with 140,000 California voters, over 600 faith, community, environmental, and equity organizations, and countless elected officials in calling on Governor Gavin Newsom to protect the rights of consumers to invest in rooftop solar, rejecting the “solar tax”, and making sure rooftop solar remains affordable for working- and middle-class consumers in the years to come.

 

CALSSA Statement on CPUC Net Metering Decision Delay

Sacramento, CA— California Solar & Storage Association (CALSSA) executive director, Bernadette Del Chiaro issued the following statement on the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) apparent further delay on the net metering 3.0 proceeding: 

Solar supporters of all types are relieved it looks as though the CPUC is throwing its unpopular proposed decision in the trash can where it belongs and is hopefully now taking time to go back to the drawing board. 

The December 13 proposed decision was a total giveaway to investor-owned utilities that would have boosted utility profits at the expense of all consumers, tens of thousands of jobs, and California’s clean energy future. A $700 annual tax on rooftop solar and an immediate gutting of the credits solar consumers received would make solar unaffordable for most consumers, especially those in working and middle class neighborhoods where solar is growing fastest. 

We urge the CPUC to listen to the huge and wide-ranging coalition of energy consumers, solar workers, affordable housing advocates, faith leaders, environmentalists, and conservationists who fought back against the utility-driven attempt to stop competition from rooftop solar. 

Any revised proposal that includes a discriminatory tax or fees of any size on solar consumers, or that makes rooftop solar and storage unaffordable to most consumers with drastic and sudden changes to the compensation they receive for selling their excess energy back to the grid, will be met with even louder disapproval. 

Rooftop solar and storage are one of California’s bright spots and they must continue to grow with a strong NEM 3 decision. California is a solar state to its core and we will not let big utilities block out our sun. 

Background on Net Metering

CPUC is considering changes to “net energy metering,” the state policy that makes rooftop solar and storage more affordable for consumers of all types by compensating them for the excess energy they produce and share with their neighbors. Currently 1.3 million consumers use net metering, including thousands of public schools, churches and affordable housing developments, and it is the main driver of California’s world-renowned rooftop solar market. As a result of net metering, working and middle class neighborhoods are just under half of the rooftop solar market and the fastest growing segment today.